DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20194837

A study of maternal risk factors and the perinatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid in central referral hospital

Kapil Singh Niranjan, Pesona Grace Lucksom

Abstract


Background: Meconium staining of amniotic fluid (MSAF) is a significant risk factor for the subsequent development of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), respiratory distress and eventual respiratory failure in neonates. To learn more about the risk factors and outcomes associated with MSAF, a prospective case control study was conducted. The objective of the study was to study various maternal risk factors associated with MSAF and to study the outcome of neonates born through MASF and to compare the perinatal outcome in patients with thick and thin meconium stained amniotic fluid.

Methods: A hospital based prospective case control study was conducted comparing pregnant women with meconium stained (cases) amniotic fluid with pregnant women having clear liquor (control), 200 in each arm. Singleton pregnancies complicated with MASF were included in the cases group on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria. Various risk factors, mode of delivery, outcome of neonates and perinatal outcome in babies born through thick and thin meconium stained amniotic fluid was studied.

Results: Out of 200 patients who had MSAF 114 patients (57%) had thick meconium stained liquor while remaining 86 patients (43.00%) had thin meconium stained amniotic fluid. Post-maturity, pregnancy induced hypertension; oligohydramnios and prolonged labor were found to be statistically significant risk factors for MSAF. Nonreactive non-stress test and Need for cesarean section was more common in women with MSAF as compared to women with clear liquor (p <0.05). Common morbidities in neonates were Birth asphyxia (15%) followed by meconium aspiration syndrome (10%) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (15%).

Conclusions: Meconium stained amniotic fluid is more commonly associated with post-maturity, pregnancy induced hypertension, oligohydramnios and prolonged labor low APGAR score and higher incidence of birth asphyxia and NICU admissions. Appropriate management of neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome is crucial to prevent neonatal mortality.


Keywords


Maternal and neonatal outcome, Meconium stained amniotic fluid, Mode of delivery, Prolonged labour, Respiratory distress, Risk factors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Holtzman BR, Banzhaf WC, Silver RK, Hageman RJ. Perinatal management of meconium stained amniotic fluid. Clin Perinatol. 1989;16:825-38.

Lopez-Rodriguez E, Echaide M, Cruz A, Taeusch HW, Perez-Gil J. Meconium impairs pulmonary surfactant by a combined action of cholesterol and bile acids. Biophys J. 2011;100(3):646-55.

Wiedemann JR, Saugstad AM, Barnes-Powell L, Duran K. Meconium aspiration syndrome. Neonatal Netw. 2008;27(2):81-7.

Singh SN, Srivastava R, Singh A, Tahazzul M, Kumar M, Kanta C, Chandra S. Respiratory distress including meconium aspiration syndrome in vigorous neonates born through meconium stained amniotic fluid: incidence, onset, severity and predictors at birth. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(7):538-43.

Davis RO, Philips JB, Harris BA, Wilson ER, Huddleston JF. Fatalmeconium aspiration syndrome occurring despite airway management considered appropriate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(6):731-6.

Galal M, Symonds I, Murray H, Petraglia F, Smith R. Postterm pregnancy. Facts, Views and Vision ObGyn. 2012;4(3):175.

Gudmundsson S, Dubiel M. Doppler velocimetry in the evaluation of fetal hypoxia. J Perinat Med. 2001;29(5):399-407.

Anderson GG. Post-maturity: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1972;27(2):65-73.

Lin HC, Su BH, Lin TW, Peng CT, Tsai CH. Risk factors of mortality in meconium aspiration syndrome: review of 314 cases. Acta paediatrica Taiwanica Taiwan er ke yi xue hui za zhi. 2004;45(1):30-4.

Whitfield JM, Charsha DS, Chiruvolu A. Prevention of meconium aspiration syndrome: an update and the Baylor experience. Proceedings (Baylor University Medical Center). 2009;22(2):128-31.

Mundhra R, Agarwal M. Fetal Outcome in Meconium Stained deliveries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2874-6.

Ahanya SN, Lakshmanan J, Morgan BL, Ross MG. Meconium passage in utero: mechanisms, consequences, and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60(1):45-56.

Kopincova J, Calkovska A. Meconium-induced inflammation and surfactant inactivation: specifics of molecular mechanisms. Pediatr Res. 2016;79(4):514-21.

Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM. Risk factors for meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(2):230-4.

Liu WF, Harrington T. Delivery room risk factors for meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19(7):367-78.

Raman TR, Jayaprakash D. Neonatal outcome in meconium stained deliveries: a prospective study. Med J Arm Forces India. 1997;53(1):15-8.

Fischer C, Rybakowski C, Ferdynus C, Sagot P, Gouyon JB. A population-based study of meconium aspiration syndrome in neonates born between 37 and 43 weeks of gestation. Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:321545.

Sedaghatian MR, Othman L, Hossain MM, Vidyasagar D. Risk of meconiumstained amniotic fluid in different ethnic groups. J Perinatol. 2000;20(4):257-61.

Mundhra R, Agarwal M. Fetal outcome in meconium stained deliveries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2874-6.

Sandhu SK, Singh J. Harpreet khora, Harleen Kaur: J Obst Gyn India. 1993;43:528.

Harikumar S. Study on meconium stained fluid-perinatal outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:587-95.

Gokhroo K, Sharma U. Various maternal factors responsible for meconium stained amniotic fluid. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2001;51:6.

Kavyashree HS, Suma KB. Study on effect of nature of meconium stained amniotic fluid on perinatal outcome. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2015;3(6):6317-24.

Sori DA, Belete A, Wolde M. Meconium stained amniotic fluid: factors affecting maternal and perinatal outcomes at Jimma University specialized teaching hospital, south west Ethiopia. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale). 2016;6:394.

Desai DS, Maitra N, Patel P. Fetal heart rate patterns in patients with thick meconium. Contracep Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:1030-5.

Sundaram R, Murugesan A. Risk factors for meconium stained amniotic fluid and its implications. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:2503-6.

Pendse V. Meconium stained Liquor amnii: its significance and effect on fetal outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1983;33:66-9.

Singh P, Soren SN. A study of perinatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid. MedPulse Int Med J. 2017;4(1):6-13.

Qadir S, Jan S, Chachoo JA, Parveen S. Perinatal and neonatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:1400-5.

Vaghela HP, Deliwala K, Shah P. Fetal outcome in deliveries with meconium stained liquor. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3:909-12.

Shaikh EM, Mehmood S, Shaikh MA. Neonatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid-one year experience. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(9):711-4.

Nayek AH, Dalal AR. Meconium staining of amniotic fluid - significance and fetal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;41:480-3.

Debdas AK, Kaur T. Meconium stained liquor: reappraisal. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1981;31:924-9.

Narang A, Nair PMC, Bhakoo ON, Vashisht K. Management of meconium stained amniotic fluid: a team approach. Indian Pediatr. 1993;30:9.

Ziadeh SM, Sunna E. Obstetrics and peninatal outcome of pregnancies with - term labour and meconium stained amniotic fluid. Arch Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;264(2):84-7.