Stings of the missing string: missing Copper T thread
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20196004Keywords:
Hysteroscopic removal, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Missing CuT thread, Transvaginal ultrasonography, X-ray abdomenAbstract
Background: Missing CuT thread is a worrisome complaint for a woman. The string may be curled in or the Cu T might have expelled or migrated.
Methods: It was a retrospective study. Authors collected the data between January 2017 to December 2017. Data was collected from OPD, OT register and Indoor patient record file. The objective was to ascertain the symptomatology, type of insertion, investigations and mode of retrieval of CuT.
Results: There were 63 cases of missing CuT thread, out of which, 42 were postpartum. 33 patients were asymptomatic. Irregular vaginal bleeding (19 patients) was commonest complaint, followed by abdominal pain (10 patients). Pregnancy was detected in one patient. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) detected intrauterine location of CuT in 60 cases. X-ray abdomen erect was needed in 3 cases, which detected intra-abdominal migration of CuT in two cases. CuT was expelled in third case. In 31 patients, CuT was removed by artery forceps in OPD. In 17 cases, hysteroscopic Copper T removal was needed. Two cases with migrated CuT underwent laparoscopy for retrieval of CuT. One patient had to be converted to laparotomy to rule out bowel injury.
Conclusions: Missing CuT thread is commonest with postpartum IUCD. TVS should be first investigation in missing CuT thread. X-ray abdomen is needed only if CuT is not visualized on TVS. Hysteroscopy can be used in patients where CuT retrieval with artery forceps fails. Laparoscopy and laparotomy may be required in migrated CuT cases.
References
Kaneshiro B, Aeby T. Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Cooper T-380A contraceptive device. Int J Women’s Health. 2010;2:211-20.
Sivin I, Batár I. State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: III. Intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept. 2010;15(2):96-112.
Roke CM. A comparative study of the ease of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contracept. 1988;37:555-63.
Waldron K. Intrauterine devices: insertion and removal: practical procedures. Aust Fam Phys. 1982;11:40-4.
Bounds W, Hutt S, Kubba A, Cooper K, Guillebaud J, Newman GB. Randomized comparative study in 217 women of three disposable plastic IUCD thread retrievers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:915-9.
Tugrul S, Yavuzer B, Yildirim G, Kayahan A. The duration of use causes of discontinuation, and problems during removal in women admitted for removal of IUD. Contracept. 2005;71:149-52.
Broso PR, Buffetti G. The IUD and uterine perforation. Minerva Ginecol. 1994;46(9):505-9.
Brar R, Doddi S, Ramasamy A, Sinha P. A forgotten migrated intrauterine contraceptive device is not always innocent: a case report. Case Rep Med. 2010:2010.
Bitterman A, Lefel O, Segev Y, Lavie O. Laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device following colon perforation. JSLS. 2010;14(3):456-8.
Mishra S. Tale of the tails, the Missing Postpartum IUCD Strings. The J Obstet Gynecol India. 2017;67(3):202-7.
Elahi N, Koukab HH. Daignosis and management of lost intrauterine contraceptive device. J Pak Med Asso. 2002;52(1):18-20.
Nowitzi KM, Hoimes ML, Chen B, Zheng LZ, Kim YH. Ultrasonography. Korean Society Ultrasound Medi. 2015;34(3):183-94.
Marchi NM, Castro S, Hidalgo MM, Hidalgo C, Monteiro-Dantas C, Villarroeal M, et al. Management of missing strings in users of intrauterine contraceptives. Contraception. 2012;86(4):354-8.
Berger-Kulemann V, Einspieler H, Hachemian N, Prayer D, Trattnig S, Weber M, et al. Magnetic field interactions of Cooper-containing intrauterine devices in 30-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: In vivo study. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14:416-22.
Prabhakaran S, Chuang A. In office retrieval of Intrauterine contraceptive devices with missing strings. Contracept. 2011;83(2):102-6.
Mederos R, Humaran L, Minervini D. Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: A case report. Int J Surg. 2008;6:60-2.
Chi E, Rosenfeld D, Sokol TP. Laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: A case report and review of the literature. Am Surg. 2005;71:1055-7.
Zeino MY, Wietfeldt ED, Advani V, Ahad S, Younkin C, Hassan I. Laparoscopic removal of a copper intrauterine device from the sigmoid colon. JSLS: J Soci Laparoendo Surg. 2011;15(4):568-70.
