Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: an experience at a tertiary care hospital


  • Fatma M. Rentiya Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GMERS Medical College and Civil Hospital, Sola, Gujarat, India
  • Ajesh N. Desai Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GMERS Medical College and Civil Hospital, Sola, Gujarat, India



Complications, Gynaecological surgery, Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive, Outcome, Safety, Total laparoscopic hysterectomy


Background: This study is aimed to review indications, demographic data of patients, clinical outcomes and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study of total 150 patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) from 1st June 2017 to 30th November 2018 in GMERS Civil Hospital Sola.

Results: ~45% patients were between 40-50 years age group; 60% patients had 2 or more deliveries; commonest indication was symptomatic adenomyosis ; uterine size in ~57% of patients were up to 6 weeks; duration of surgery in ~91% of patients <120 minutes; intraoperative blood loss in all cases <200ml; no intra-operative and postoperative complications were encountered.

Conclusions: TLH is safe procedure with minimal blood loss, minimal postoperative pain and discomfort and shorter duration of hospital stay when performed via expert hands.


Millar WJ. Hysterectomy, 1981/82 to 1996/97. Statistics Canada. Health Reports. 2001;12:9-22.

Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL. The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Classification committee of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:9-15.

Reich H, Dicaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213-6.

Lassen PD, Moeller-Larsen H, De Nully P. Same day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand. 2012;91(11):1339-41.

Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M. A randomized prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:345-50.

Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomized, prospective study of short-term outcome. BJOG. 2000;107:1380-5.

Cheung VYT, Rosenthal DM. Laparoscopic versus abdominal supracervical hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(Suppl):S68.

Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Napp V, Brown J, Hawe J, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129-36.

Lefebvre G, Allaire C, Jeffrey J, Vilos G. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines No 109. Hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24:37-48.

Garry R. The future of hysterectomy. BJOG. 2005;112:133-9.

Soriano D, Goldstein A, Lecuru F, Darai E. Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand. 2001;80:337-1.

Richardson R, Bournas N, Magos A. Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Lancet. 1995;345:36-41.

Garry R. Toward evidence-based hysterectomy. Gynaecol Endosc. 1998;7:225-33.






Original Research Articles