DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20194865

Pregnancy outcomes of normal versus abnormal cardiotocography in a tertiary centre in Nepal

Mariyam Faruqi, Shailaja C. Shrestha, Rabindra D. Bhatta

Abstract


Background: Pregnancy and childbirth is normal physiological process with great pathological potential. The obstetricians are more concerned with the early recognition of fetal distress during labour and such an adverse outcome should be detected at the earliest point of time by an effective surveillance method. Cardiotocography as a part of biophysical profile has become an established diagnostic tool for fetal surveillance. To compare early perinatal outcome of normal and abnormal cardiotocography in terms of APGAR scores, need for neonatal resuscitation, NICU admission, perinatal death and mode of delivery.

Methods: It was a cross-sectional study. 200 nulliparous/multiparous women with singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at gestational age 37-42 weeks in latent stage of labor were enrolled in the study and subjected to admission test in left lateral position using fetal monitor. Baseline FHR and contraction pattern were determined for 20 minutes and classification of patients was done into normal, and suspicious or abnormal according to the FIGO guidelines 2015.

Results: Low APGAR scores, rate of LSCS, need for neonatal resuscitation, neonatal admission were more in the abnormal cardiotocography group. Cardiotocography in the current study has high sensitivity and high negative predictive value for detecting fetal distress.

Conclusions: From the analysis of this study, it would be safe to conclude that an ominous cardiotocography should be managed appropriately without delay and obstetrician should be vigilant in suspicious as well as in normal admission test group for timely intervention for bettering the neonatal outcome.


Keywords


APGAR, Cardiotocography, Intrapartum fetal surveillance, Loop of cord around fetal neck Pregnancy outcome, Meconium stained liquor, Neonatal resuscitation, NICU admission

Full Text:

PDF

References


Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Soomro T, Menezes EV, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2009;1:S5.

Sandhu GS, Raju R, Bhattacharyya TK. Admission cardiotocography screening of high-risk obstetric patients. Med J Arm Forc India. 2008;64(1):43-5.

Gupta M, Nagar T, Gupta P. Role of cardiotocography to improve perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancy. IJCMR. 2017;4(4):853-6.

Arulkumaran SS, Rohan D’ Souza. Intrapartum fetal monitoring In: The management of labour, 3rd edition, Hyderabad: Universities Press (India); 2011:85-111.

Parer JT, King T. Fetal heart rate monitoring: is it salvageable?. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;182(4):982-7.

Prabha S, Jha K. Role of admission cardiotocography in predicting perinatal outcome in low risk obstetric population. IJMRP. 2017;3(2):3-6.

Behuria S, Nayak R. Admission cardiotocography as a screening test in high risk pregnancies and its co-relation with peri-natal outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(10):3525-8.

Goyal SG, Shah PT, Deliwala KJ. Role of fetal monitoring in high risk pregnancy by fetal electrocardiogram, Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(4):893-7.

Khursheed F, Chandra MD, Jatoi N. Cardiotocography: obstetric and neonatal outcome. J Rawalpindi Med College. 2009;13(2):86-8.

Paes DF, Mataliya MA, Mhatre PN. The admission test and its relation with labour outcome. Obstet Gynaecol Ind. 1996;46:324-7.

Vinita D, Katiyar N, Malik GK. Role of admission test. J Obstet Gynae. 2002;51(1):48-50.

Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Kurup A, Anandakumar C, Selemat N, Ratnam SS. Search for the most predictive tests of fetal well-being in early labor. J Peri Med-Official J WAPM. 1996;24(3):199-206.

Mahomed J. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring-continuous electronic versus intermittent doppler-a randomised controlled trial. Central African J Med. 1992;38(12):458-62.

Sultana J, Chowdhury TA, Begum K, Khan MH. Comparison of normal and abnormal cardiotocography with pregnancy outcomes and early neonatal outcomes. Mymensingh medical journal: MMJ. 2009;18(1 Suppl):S103-107.

Xavier AA, Pandey D, Dogra L, Lewis LE. Cardiotocography in a perinatal armamentarium: boon or bane?. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;4(6):2000-4.

Impey L, Reynolds M, MacQuillan K, Gates S, Murphy J, Sheil O. Admission cardiotocography: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2003;361(9356):465-70.

Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang MH, Henderson SL. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2001:2.

Desai P, Gandhvi U. Admission CTG as a screening test for fetal distress: not reliable. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2004;54:3:260-2.

Gourounti, K, Sandall J. Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart rate: Effects on neonatal APGAR score, on the rate of caesarean sections and on the rate of instrumental delivery: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(6):1029-35.