DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20196021

Towards optimizing caesarean section: a five-year review of caesarean sections at a Southern Nigeria hospital

Nkencho Osegi, Olakunle I. Makinde

Abstract


Background: Monitoring caesarean sections at hospital level is essential to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections while still ensuring adequate access to caesarean section. This study was conducted to determine the caesarean section rate and indications for caesarean section at the study centre and provide objective data for institutional interventions towards reducing unnecessary caesarean sections in the centre.

Methods: A retrospective descriptive study of patients that had caesarean sections between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2017 at the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Nigeria. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.

Results: There were 5,793 deliveries and 1,654 were by caesarean section. The average caesarean section rate was 28.6%. The leading indications for caesarean section were cephalopelvic disproportion (26.6%), previous cesarean section (18.2%), suspected fetal distress (11.2%), severe preeclampsia/eclampsia (7.9%), obstructed labour (6%), and breech presentation (5.9%).

Conclusions: The 28.6% caesarean section rate in this study falls within a widely varied rate across Nigeria at hospital level but is comparable to rates within the south-south geopolitical zone of Nigeria. The leading indications for caesarean section are modifiable, thus there is room for institutional intervention to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Collaborative research between institutions is required to assess peculiar regional determinants of caesarean section towards developing suitable interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections regionally.


Keywords


Caesarean section rate, Clinical Interventions, Indications, Maternal outcome, Non-clinical interventions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boley JP. The history of caesarean section. Can Med Assoc J. 1991;145(4):319-21.

World Health Organization. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook, 2009. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44121. Accessed on 15th November 2019.

Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8:71.

Gupta M, Saini V. Caesarean section: mortality and morbidity. JCDR. 2018;12(9):1-6.

Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, Karthikeyan G, Kumar V, Kaur I, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;393:1973-82.

Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gulmezoglu AM for the WHO working group on caesarean section. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667-70.

World Health Organization. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates, 2015. Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/. Accessed on 15th November 2019.

Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

Feng XI, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:30-39A.

Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Wojdyla D. Determinants of caesarean section rates in developed countries: supply, demand and opportunities for control. World Health Report. 2010;29:1-22.

Betran AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018;392:1358-68.

John CO, Alegbeleye JO. Caesarean delivery at a teaching hospital, south-south Nigeria: a five-year review. IJTDH. 2017;21(2):1-6.

Njoku CO, Emechebe CI, Edet EE, Oyama SE, Iklaki CU. The trend, determinants and maternal outcome of caesarean section at the university of Calabar teaching hospital, Calabar, Nigeria; a 5 year appraisal. IOSR-JDMS. 2016;15(12):75-9.

Ugwu EOV, Obioha KCE, Okezie OA, Ugwu AO. A five-year survey of caesarean delivery at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2011;1(1):77-84.

Eleje GU, Udigwe GO, Akabuike JC, Eke AC, Eke NO, Umeobika JC. The rate of caesarean section in Nnewi, Nigeria: a 10-year review. Afrimedic J. 2010;1(1):11-4.

Onoh RC, Eze JN, Ezeonu PO, Lawani LO, Iyoke CA, Peter ON. A 10-year appraisal of caesarean delivery and the associated fetal and maternal outcomes at a teaching hospital in southeast Nigeria. IJWH. 2015;7:531-8.

Daniel CN, Singh S. Caesarean delivery: An experience from a tertiary institution in north western Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19:18-24.

Isah AD, Adewole N, Zaman J. A five-year survey of caesarean delivery at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:14-7.

Adelaiye SM, Olusanya A, Onwuhafua PI. Caesarean section in Amhadu Bello University teaching hospital Zaria, Nigeria: A five-year appraisal. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;34:34-8.

Takai IU, Bah AM, Bukah M, Ugwa EA, Gaya SA. Caesarean delivery in a tertiary health institution in north-eastern Nigeria: A 5 year-review. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;32(2):21-7.

Geidam AD, Audu BM, Kawuwa BM, Obed JY. Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the university of Maiduguri teaching hospital, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2009;8(2):127-32.

Ugwa E, Ashimi A, Abubakar MY. Caesarean section and perinatal outcomes in a sub-urban tertiary hospital in north-west Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2015;56:180-4.

Nwobodo EI, Wara HL. High caesarean section rate at Federal Medical Centre, Birnin-Kebbi: Real or apparent? Niger Med Pract. 2004;46(2):39-40.

Akadri AA, Odelola OI. A six-year review of caesarean sections at Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital Sagamu, south west Nigeria. Niger Med Pract. 2017;71(3-4):53-7.

Akinola OI, Fabamwo AO, Tayo AO, Rabiu KA, Oshodi YA, Alokha ME. Caesarean section – an appraisal of some predictive factors in Lagos Nigeria. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2014;14:217.

Ikeako LC, Nwajiaku L, Ezegwui HU. Caesarean section in a secondary health hospital in Awka, Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2009;50:64-7.

Osonwa OK, Eko JE, Ekeng PE. Trends in caesarean section at Calabar General Hospital, Cross River State, Nigeria. EJBMSR. 2016;4(1):1-5.

Sule HM, Hassan ZI, Shambe IH. Caesarean section rate and its indications in an urban private hospital in Jos, north central Nigeria: A 15-year survey. IOSR-JDMS. 2017;16(6):88-92.

Adewuyi EO, Auta A, Khanal V, Tapshak SJ, Zhao Y. Caesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors - a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027273.

Thomas S, Meadows J, McQueen KAK. Access to caesarean section will reduce maternal mortality in low-income countries: a mathematical model. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1537-41.

Irani M, Deering S. Challenges affecting access to caesarean delivery and strategies to overcome them in low-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):30-4.

Kingdon C, Downe S, Betran AP. Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e025073.

Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, Mortazhejri S, Rader T, Petkovic J, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. 2018;9:CD005528.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections, 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth /publications/non-clinical-interventions-to-reduce-cs/en/. Accessed on 15th November 2019.

Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181-93.

Coleman VH, Lawrence H, Schulkin J. Rising caesarean delivery rates: The impact of caesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64(2):115-9.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of paediatrics. The Apgar score. Committee opinion No. 644. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e52-5.

Anozie OB, Osaheni LL, Onu FA, Onoh RC, Ogah EO, Eze JN, et al. Declining rate of operative vaginal deliveries in Nigeria. OJOG. 2018;8(3):175-84.

Unuigbe JA, Agbon-Ojeme GE, Erthatiemwonmon RA, Maduako KT. Instrumental vaginal deliveries: A review. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:99-107.