Published: 2019-12-26

The burden of caesarean section and its determinants from a tertiary care hospital, Thrissur, Kerala, India

Merin Baby, Sruthi M. V.


Background: Caesarean section is a surgical procedure done when vaginal delivery is contraindicated. The prevalence of caesarean section in Kerala showing an increasing trend. Even though the caesarean section is an emergency lifesaving procedure, various other factors like socio-demographic determinants, economic factors and patient’s or clinician’s preferences also influence this increasing trend. The present study was undertaken to compare the various determinants of caesarean section with normal delivery from a tertiary care hospital in Thrissur district.

Methods: A hospital-based case control study was done taking mothers who had undergone caesarean section as cases and mothers who had undergone normal delivery as controls during two-month period. The sample size was calculated using the formulae: (Zα + Zβ)2x2xPQ/d2, and the calculated sample size was 88. The various determinants used were socio-demographic, obstetrics and cultural determinants.

Results: In this study, it was found that the most common indications for C-section were previous C-section, PPROM and foetal distress. There was a statistically significant association between obstetrics determinants like complications during pregnancy, number of USG taken, period of gestation with mode of delivery. The present study also shows that mothers with educational status up to graduate/PG have lesser incidence of caesarean section. There was a statistically significant association between delivery date close to holidays/festival days and C-section.

Conclusions: It is necessary to have health awareness sessions to pregnant mothers about the complication of pregnancy, benefits of normal delivery and complications of C-sections in-order to reduce the patients’ preference for C-section.


Caesarean section, Determinants, Thrissur

Full Text:



Balakrishnan S. Textbook of Obstetrics. Hyderabad: Paras Medical Publisher; 2007:457-465.

World Health Organization. Monitoring emergency obstetric care a handbook. 2009. Available at: http:///

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, GOI. National Family Health Survey-4 2015-2016.Mumbai; 2017. Available at:

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, GOI. National Family Health Survey-3 2005-2006.Mumbai; 2007. Available at:

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. The Lancet. 1985;326(8452):436-7.

Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Joner G, Cinek O, Svensson J, Goldacre MJ. Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetol. 2008;51(5):726-35.

Thavagnanam, S, Fleming J, Bromley A, Shields M. D, Cardwell CR. A meta-analysis of the association between Caesarean section and childhood asthma. Clin Exper Aller. 2008;38(4):629-33.

Thankappan KR. Cesarean section deliveries on the rise in Kerala. Natl Med J India. 1999;12(6):297.

Divyamol N, Raphael L, Koshy N. Caesarean section rate and its determinants in a rural area of South India. Int J Comm Med Pub Health. 2016;3:2836-40.

Unnikrishnan B, Prasad B, Amarnath A, Kumar N, Rekha T, Mithra et al. Trends and indications f or caesarean section in a tertiary care obstetric hospital in coastal South India. Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore (Manipal University). AMJ. 2010;3(12):821-5

Nahar K. Indications of caesarean section-study of 100 cases in Mymensingh Medical College Hospital. J Shaheed Suhraw Med Col. 2009;1(1):6-10.

Ghosh S. Increasing trend in caesarean section delivery in India: Role of medicalization of maternal health. 2010. Available at: WP % 20236% 20- % 20 Sancheeta % 20 Ghosh. Pdf

Hemachandran K. Burden cause and cost of caesarean section. Working paper series, Working paper. 2003:24.