Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and self-blood pressure monitoring for diagnosing white coat hypertension amongst pregnant women


  • Sandeep Sood Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Command Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Sirisha Anne Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Command Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Kuldeep Kumar Ashta Department of Internal Medicine, Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt, Delhi, India
  • Ravi Kumar Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India



Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, Gestational hypertension, Pregnancy, Self-blood pressure monitoring, White coat hypertension


Background: White coat hypertension (WCH) is a common and well recognized phenomenon. It is also very prevalent amongst pregnant women and is often diagnosed as chronic/ gestational hypertension leading to unnecessary medications during pregnancy. ABPM is the gold standard for diagnosis of WCH. SBPM is an easy effective and reliable method to measure blood pressure but its efficacy needs to be tested and compared with ABPM in cases of WCH. It is important to compare the two methods in assessing WCH so SBPM can be utilized in cases of WCH, if found useful and efficacious.

Methods: All pregnant women who presented to the ANC were screened for hypertension. Those who were diagnosed to be hypertensive in antenatal clinic and these patients were then admitted for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for 24 hours and SBPM on 6 hourly bases for 5 days.

Results: The ABPM and SBPB readings were noted, tabulated and compared. It was found that the prevalence of ‘WCH’ in this study using ABPM and SBPM were 47.368% (27/54) and 45.614% (26/54) respectively.

Conclusions: The results in diagnosing WCH using ABPM and SBPM were comparable.


Brown MA, Davis GK. Hypertension in pregnancy. In: Mancia G, Chalmers J, Julius S, et al, editors. Manual of Hypertension. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:579-598.

Brown MA, Mangos G, Greg D, Homer C. The natural history of white coat hypertension during pregnancy. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;112:601-6.

Franklin SS, Thijs L, Hansen TW, O’Brien E, Staessen JA. White-Coat Hypertension: New Insights from Recent Studies. Am Heart Assoc J. 2013;62(6):982-6.

Higgins JR, de Swiet. M. Blood -pressure measurement and classification in pregnancy. Lancet. 2001;357:131-5.

Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Statement from International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hyper Preg. 2001;20:x–xiv.

Contard S, Chanudet X, Coisne D, Battistella P, Marichal JF, Pitiot M, Gaudemaris R, Ribstein J. Ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in normal pregnancy. Am J Hypertens. 1993:880-4.

Halligan A, O’Brien E, O’Malley K, Mee F, Atkins N, Conroy R, Walshe JJ, Darling M. Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement in a primigravid population. J Hypertens. 1993;11:869-73.

Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A, Fernández JR. Time-qualified reference values for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy. Hypertens. 2001;38:746-52.

Stergiou GS, Asayama K, Thijs L, Kollias A, Niiranen TJ, Hozawa A, et al. Prognosis of White-Coat and Masked Hypertension. Hypertens. 2014;63:675-82.

Owens P, Atkins N, O’Brien E. Diagnosis of white coat hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Hypertens. 1999;34(2):267-72.

Reynolds K, Bowling CB, Sim JJ, Sridharan L, Harrison TN, Shimbo D. The utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for diagnosing white coat hypertension in older adults. Current Hypertens Reports. 2015;17(11):86.

Boggia J, Hansen TW, Asayama K, Luzardo L, Li Yan, Staessen JA. White-coat hypertension on automated blood pressure measurement: implications for clinical practice. Eu J Cardiovasc Med. 2011;1(4):17-21.

Mc Grath BP. Home monitoring of blood pressure. Aust Prescr. 2015;38:16-9.

Hernández-Díaz S, Toh S, Cnattingius S. Risk of pre-ecclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2255.

Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005;330:565.

Cnattingius S, Reilly M, Pawitan Y, Lichtenstein P. Maternal and fetal genetic factors account for most of familial aggregation of preeclampsia: a population-based Swedish cohort study. Am J Med Genet. 2004;130A:365-71.

Bar J, Maymon R, Padoa A, Wittenberg C, Boner G, Ben-Rafael Z, et al. White coat hypertension and pregnancy outcome. J Human Hypertens. 1999;13(8):541.

Zhang L, Li Y, Wei FF, Thijs L, Kang YY, Wang S, et al. Strategies for classifying patients based on office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement. Hypertens. 2015;65(6):1258-65.

Ghuman N, Campbell P, White WB. Role of ambulatory and home blood pressure recording in clinical practice. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009;11(6):414-21.

Sheppard JP, Fletcher B, Gill P, Martin U, Roberts N, McManus RJ. Predictors of the home-clinic blood pressure difference: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2015;29(5):614-25.

Celis H, Den Hond E, Staessen JA. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home in the management of hypertension. Clin Med Res. 2005;3(1):19-26.

Den Hond E, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Leeman M, O'Brien E, et al. Self-measured versus ambulatory blood pressure in the diagnosis of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003;21(4):717-22.

Kim SG. Clinical implications of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring. Korean Circ J. 2010;40:423-31.

Bellomo G, Narducci PL, Rondoni F, Pastorelli G, Stangoni G, Angeli G, et al. Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure in pregnancy. JAMA. 1999;282:1447-52.

Moutquin JM, Rainville C, Giroux L, Raynauld P, Amyot G, Bilodeau R, et al. A prospective study of blood pressure in pregnancy: prediction of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(2):191-6.






Original Research Articles