DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200353

Evaluation of simple International ovarian tumor analysis ultra sound rules in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors and their histopathological correlation

Bhawna Sharma, Neetu Arora, Rajiv Acharya, Vineeta Gupta, Anshu Sharma, Namrata Saxena, Brijesh Thakur, Rohit Sharma

Abstract


Background: IOTA (International ovarian tumor analysis) study is considered one of the largest studies on ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian pathology conducted in literature till date. It was started in 1999 and included nine European countries. It is a standardized technique for preoperative classification of ovarian pathology defined by IOTA group.

Methods: A retrospective study was analyzed from a period of January 2016 to December 2017 (2-year period). The records of all the patients operated for benign and malignant ovarian pathology in the gynae department of hospital were retrieved from medical record sections. USG findings were redefined as per IOTA simple rules by sonologist and its histopathological correlation was done using kappa statistical method.

Results: In the present study, out of 61 patients IOTA was applicable to 57 patients. The sensitivity where IOTA simple rules were applicable was 92.8% and the specificity was 93%. The accuracy turned out to be 92.9%. If inconclusive results were taken as malignant then sensitivity increased to 94% and specificity decreased to 87%. Good level of agreement was found between sonological and histopathological findings with Kappa statistics application (K = 0.59).

Conclusions: The IOTA simple rules can be considered as an important diagnostic modality in differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian tumors, it has an added advantage of abolishing the subjectivity of routine ultrasound. However inconclusive results demand further expertise in the field and need to be taken care of before interpretation of ovarian pathologies.


Keywords


B-Rules, International ovarian tumor analysis, Kappa statistics, M-Rules, Ovarian pathology, Ultrasound

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kaijser J, Bourne J, Valentin L, Sayasneh A, Van Holsbeke C, Vergote I, et al. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the international ovarian tumour analysis (IOTA) studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;41:9-20.

Erdogan N, Ozcelik B, Serin Is, Akgun M, Ozturk F. Doppler ultrasound assessment and serum cancer antigen 125 in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;91:146-50.

Mousavi AS, Borna S, Moeinoddini S. Estimation of probability of malignancy using a logistic model combining color doppler ultrasonography, serum Ca125 level in women with a pelvic mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:92-8.

Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren WB. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:70-6.

Timmerman D, Schwarzler P, Collins WP. Subjective Assessment of Adnexal Masses with The Use Of Ultrasonography: An Analysis Of Interobserver Variability And Experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13:11-6.

Kurjak A, Predanic M, Kupesic-Urek S, Jukic S. Transvaginal color and pulsed doppler assessment of adnexal tumor vascularity. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;50:3-9.

Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Neeyalavira V, Khunamornpong S, Sukpan K. E-Ow doppler indices for prediction of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:139-42.

Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA Group. BMJ. 2010;341:6839.

Fathallah K, Huchon C, Bats AS. external validation of simple ultrasound rules of timmerman on 122 ovarian tumors. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2011;39:477-81.

Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, et al. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;31(6):681-90.

Hartman CA, Juliato CRT, Sarianlo, Toledo MC, Jales RM, Morais SS, et al. Ultrasound criteria and Ca 125 as predictive variables of ovarian cancer in women with adnexal tumours. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;40:360-6.

Sayasneh A, Kaijser J, Preisler J, Johnson S, Stalder C, Husicka R, et al. A multicenter prospective external validation of the diagnostic performance of iota simple descriptors and rules to characterise ovarian masses. Gynaecol Oncol. 2013;130(1):140-6.

Alcazar J, Pascual MA, Olartecoechea B, Graupera B, Auba M, Ajossa S, et al. IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;42:467-71.

Nunes N, Yazbek J, Ambler G, Hoo W, Naftalin J, Jurkovic D, et al. Prospective evaluation of the IOTA logistic regression model Lr2 for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;40(3):355-9.

Garg S, Kaur A, Mohi JK, Sibia PK, Kaur N. Evaluation of IOTA simple ultrasound rules to distinguish benign and malignant ovarian tumours. J Clin Diagnos Res. 2017;11(8):TC06.

Tantipalakorn C, Wanapirak C, Khunamornpong S, Sukpan K, Tongsong T. IOTA simple rules in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumours. Asian Paci C J Cancer Prevent. 2014;15(13):5123-16.