DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200356

A comparative study to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and correlation between saline infusion sonography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in infertility

Arti Tiwari, Beenu Kushwah Singh, Anuradha Mishra

Abstract


Background: Till date hysterosalpingography (HSG) remains the first-line method to detect tubal patency and to find out any uterine abnormalities in infertile female while diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy (DHL)  is considered to be the gold standard method, it is during last decades only that saline infusion sonography (SIS)/ sonohysterography (SHG) has emerged as an efficacious method of checking tubal patency and uterine anatomy as well. The present study aims to compare all three methods viz- SIS, HSG and DHL and to evaluate the correlation between these methods.

Methods: 98 infertile females of age group 18-35 years with normal Hormonal profile without any male factor infertility, were prospectively selected from the outpatient department of obstetrics and gynecology, GMH Rewa, Madhya Pradesh over one year from 1st August 2016 to 31st July 2017.

Results: Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of SIS was found to be more than HSG for both tubal patency and uterine abnormalities detection. SIS has less numbers of false positive and false negative rates as compared to HSG. DHL was found to be much superior to both SIS and HSG, also detected additional findings in multiple sites like pelvis, tubes and the uterus on the same setting which were missed on SIS and HSG.

Conclusions: SIS may replace HSG as a first step screening method for tubal patency detection, as it has more diagnostic accuracy than HSG and better correlation with DHL and has many advantages and minimal disadvantages as compared to HSG.


Keywords


Diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy, Hysterosalpingography, Infertility, Saline infusion sonography

Full Text:

PDF

References


McLaren JF. Infertility evaluation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39:453-63.

Mehta AV, Modi AP, Raval BM, Munshi SP, Patel SB. Role of diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in the evaluation of infertility. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(2):437-40.

Jahan S. Role of laparoscopy in infertility: review article. Birdem Med J. 2012;2:99-103.

El-Mazny A, AbouSalem N, El-Sherbiny W, Saber W. Outpatient hysteroscopy: a routine investigation before assisted reproductive techniques? Fertil Steril. 2011;95:272-6.

Agrawal R, Shrivastava D. Role of hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal factors and its comparison with sonosalpingography. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;1:121-6.

Kulkarni NN, Patel R, Patel NR. Comparative study of SHG VS HSG for tubal patency test. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(10):3300-3.

Hajishafiha M, Zobairi T, Zanjani VR. Diagnostic value of sonohysterography in the determination of fallopian tube patency as an initial step of routine infertility assessment. J Ultra Med. 2009;28:1671-7.

Arpana S, Konpal A, Rakesh K. Comparison of transvaginal sonosalpingography to chromolaparoscopy for evaluation of tubal patency in infertility patients. IOSR-JDMS. 2016;15:47-9.

Malik B, Patil S, Boricha BG, Kurkal N, Choudhry M. A comparative study of the efficacy of sonosalpingography and hysterosalpingogram to test the tubal patency in all women with primary and secondary infertility. Ultrasound Quart. 2014;30:139-43.

Shah SJ, Shah AC, Dwivedi YN. Study of combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic findings in 100 cases of infertility. NHL J Med Sci. 2014;3:68-71.

Yildizhan B, Durmusoglu F, Uygur M, Erenus M. A new technique for the diagnosis of fallopian tube patency by hysteroscopy with ultrasound compared with hysterosalpingography in infertile women. Archi Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;280:543-7.

Barati M, Zargar M, Saramasihi. Office hysteroscopy in infertility. Int J Fert Ster. 2009;3:17-20.

Sahu L, Tempe A, Gupta S. Hysteroscopic evaluation in infertile patients: a prospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2012;1:37-41.

Razek M, Shawky M. The safety and acceptability of saline infusion sonography versus hysterosalpingography for evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2015;20:108-13.

Pujar Y, Sherigar B, Patted S, Desai B, Dhumale H. Comparative evaluation of saline infusion sonohysterography and hysterolaparoscopy for diagnosis of uterine cavity abnormalities and tubal patency in infertility: a one-year cross sectional study. South Asian Fed Obstet Gynecol. 2010;2:133-5.

Acholonu Jr UC, Silberzweig J, Stein DE, Keltz M. Hysterosalpingography versus sonohysterography for intrauterine abnormalities. JSLS. 2011;15:471-4.

Meenakshi BC, Pinkey LS, Smiti N, Van M. Hysterosalpingography versus hysteroscopy: role in assessment of uterine factors during infertility workup. JP IJIFM. 2013;4:79-82.

Dasan TA, Basawaraj NG. A comparative study of saline-infused sonohysterography and conventional hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of female infertility. West Afr J Radio. 2016;23:124-9.

Singh V, Mishra B, Sinha S, Agrawal S, Thakur P. Role of saline infusion sono hysterography in infertility evaluation. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018;11(3):236-41.

Mehta AV, Modi AP, Raval BM, Munshi SP, Patel SB. Role of diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in the evaluation of infertility. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:437-40.