DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200872

Utility of paperless partogram in labor management

Nazli Tarannum, Nishat Akhtar

Abstract


Background: Partograph use in labor has revolutionized the obstetric care. WHO recommends universal use of WHO modified partograph, which in clinical setup is less often used. Debdas (2006) proposed the paperless partogram which is designed for use by clinician/nurses/midwives as it is very simple and low skill method. The present study is proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of paperless partogram as a bedside tool and its comparison with WHO modified partograph.

Methods: It was a prospective analytical study done in department of obstetrics and gynecology, JNMCH, AMU, Aligarh from September 2017 to July 2019 and included 400 pregnant women at term, divided into 2 groups of 100 each Group A (paperless partogram) and Group B (WHO modified partograph) and their labor events were followed.

Results: Out of 200 women that were included in each group, maximum women were multigravida, 58.5% in group A and 61.5% women in Group B. Mean age in Group A was 24.68±3.8years and Group B was 24.93±3.75 years. The mean duration of labor in Group A was 3.57±2.20 hours and Group B was 3.40±2.03 hours. There were 87.5% of women who delivered before alert ETD, likewise in Group B; women who delivered before alert line are 88.5%. These differences were statically not significant. Perinatal outcome was also similar in both groups.

Conclusions: In our study, the paperless study was found to be as efficient as WHO modified partograph for management of labor. The mean delivery time was 3.57 hours similar to WHO partograph of difference between alert and action line. Thus, for resource poor setting like India with overburdened population paperless partogram can be used as an alternative to WHO modified partograph which is complex and time consuming.


Keywords


Alert estimated time of delivery, Management of labor, Paperless partogram

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: estimate by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2015.

World Health Organization. 2014. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013 - estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations. Population Division. World Health Organization.

Friedman E. Graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68:1568-75.

Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common. 1972;79:592-8.

Dujardin B, De Schampheleire I, Kurker R, Bailey J. The partograph: is it worth including the latent phase. Trop Doct. 1995;25(1):43-4.

World Health Organization. World Health Organization partogram in the management of Labour. Lancet. 1994;343:1399-404.

Roy D, Mandal D, Sahana RK, Mandal A, Chowdhury P, Kundu P. ETD-expected time of delivery: a new simple clinical tool for management of labour. AICOG Patna. 2014;2.

Pujar KG, Salian SV, Kulkarni SR. Partographic analysis of labour by modified who partograph in primigavidae: a prospective observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:166-9.

Debdas AK, Singh V. Role of partogram in indian scenario, obgyn highlights-an evidence-based review, Ed Chatterjee, A and Das Mahapatra P, jointly published by AICC-RCOG, Eastern Zone and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of India, on the occasion of 21st AICC RCOG Conference, Kolkata. 2006:37-44.

Debdas AK. Paperless Partogram. 41st Annual Scientific Session 2008; Sri Lanka Coll Obstet Gynaecol SLJOG. 2008;1(1):124.

Kawuwa MB, Mairiga AG, Usman HA. Maternal mortality: Barriers to care at the health facility- Health workers perspective. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;26(6):544-5.

Dujardin B, De Schampheleire I, Sene H, Ndiaye F. Value of the alert and action lines on the partogram. Lancet. 1992;339:1336-8.

Fawole AO, Hunyinbo KI, Adekunle DA. Knowledge and utilization of the partograph among obstetric care givers in South West Nigeria. Af J Reprod Health. 2010;12(1):22-9.

Oladapo OT, Daniel OJ, Olatunji AO. Knowledge and use of the partograph among health care personnel at the peripheral maternity centers in Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;26(6):538-41.

Qureshi ZP, Sekadde-Kigondu C, Mutiso SM. Advanced obstertrics nursing: partograph utilisation. East African. 2010:123-9.

Opiah MM, Abosede Bola OF, Essien EJ, Monjok E. Knowledge and utilization of the partograph among midwives in the Niger Delta Region Nigeria. Af J Reprod Health. 2012;16(1):125-32.

Elizabeth A. The Paperless Partogram: A Simplified Tool to Prevent Prolonged Labor. Available at: http://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/blog/paper less-partogramsimplified-tool-prevent-prolonged-labor. Accessed on 2012 e 28.

WHO partograph cuts complications of labor and childbirth? Safe Mother. 1994;(15):10.

Mathews JE, Rajaratnam A, George A, Mathai M. Comparison of two World Health Organization (WHO) partographs. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;96(2):147-50.

Mathai, Matthews. The partograph for the prevention of obstructed labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(2):256-69.

Giri DK, Nayak L, Dala DK. Comparison of procedure and predictability between WHO partogram and paperless partogram. JMSCR. 2019;7(7):611-4.

Deka G, Sharma R, Das GC.The paperless partograph-can it be effective to replace the WHO modified partograph. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:452-5.

Veena L, Sarojini, Anagondanahalli P, Prakash, Suchitra. Study to compare between paperless partogram and modified who partogram in management of labour. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:99-103.