DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20201842

Changing trends in cesarean section: from 1950 to 2020

Babulal S. Patel, Noopur Kedia, Sushma R. Shah, Saumya P. Agrawal, Vismay B. Patel, Adwait B. Patel

Abstract


Caesarean section (C.S) is a part of the standard care in modern obstetrics. The indications for a caesarean section as an alternative to vaginal delivery have evolved over the centuries. Its practicality, disponibility, and apparent safety have placed caesarean section, a first-line procedure in many clinical scenarios. The awareness of perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with safety of caesarean, expert anaesthesia, potent antibiotics, blood transfusion facilities and better neonatal care have increased incidence of caesarean section very fast. Thus, there is fast, steady and definite rise in incidence of caesarean section everywhere. But the question is ‘Is a rising caesarean section rate is inevitable?’. Studies carried out to understand CS deliveries has adopted different framework. The issue treats elements of ethics in the medical profession, gender issues, choices of women, the quality of institutional services, etc. The findings of retrospective studies have suggested that the caesarean section rate could be reduced in certain categories. In this study, we discuss the various ways in which it can be achieved.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Changing trends, Indications, Influences, Judicious approach, Vaginal delivery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Trends in Cesarean Section by Andres Sarmiento, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Columbia, 2018. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.5772/ intechopen.77309. Accessed on 4th January 2020.

Caesarean section - A Brief History, 1993. Factsheet-National Library of Medicine. Available at: https://www.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed on 5th January 2020.

Boley JP. The history of caesarean section. CMAJ. 1991;145(4):319-2.

Pfannenstiel HJ. The advantages of the suprasymphysar fascia cross-section for gynacological coliotomies also contribute to the indication of the surgical routes. In: Collection of Clinical Lectures. 1900;268(97):1735-56.

Kerr JMM. The technic of cesarean section, with special reference to the lower uterine segment incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1926;12(5):729-34.

Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. Factsheet: NCHS Data Brief, September 2017. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db287.htm. Accessed on 2nd December 2019.

Chalmers. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436-7.

Betran AP. The increasing trend in cesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014 Plos One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

Beogo I. Determinants and materno-fetal outcomes related to cesarean section delivery in private and public hospitals in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMC Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):5.

WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Factsheet: World Health Organization 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth /topics/maternal-perinatal/cs-statement/en/. Accessed on 15th September 2019.

Blondel B. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod. 2017;46(10):701-13.

Kamal P, Kaur HP, Nagpal M. Is current rising trend of CS justified? Inter J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(3):872-6.

Ghosh S. Increasing trend in caesarean section delivery in India: role of medicalisation of maternal health. Bangalore: Institute for Social and Economic Change; 2010. Available at: Handle: RePEc:sch:wpaper:236. Accessed on 2nd January 2020.

Robson M. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;15(1):179-94.

Robson SJ. Thirty years of the WHO target caesarean section rate: time to move on. Med J Aus. 2017;206(4):181-5.