DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20201798

Comparative study of induced and spontaneous labour in nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph

Kamlesh Yadav, Monika Ranga, Ankur Nama

Abstract


Background: Induced or spontaneous labour has implication on the eventual mode of delivery and neonatal outcome. The aim of study is to compare mean duration of labour andmaterno-foetal outcome of induced versus spontaneous labour among nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph.

Methods: The study was conducted in nulliparous women coming at term in active phase of labour (with cervical dilatation at least 4 cm) either spontaneous or induced, both labouring women were monitored using modified WHO partograph. Outcomes measures include requirement of augmentation of labour with oxytocin, mean duration of labour, eventual mode of delivery and the materno foetal outcome.

Results: A total 100 women were compared in each group. There was no difference in mean age group, BMI, gestational age. More women had spontaneous vaginal delivery among those with spontaneous labour (76% versus 58%) (p=0.033). The mean duration of second stage of labour was significantly more in induced labour (16.25 minutes) than in spontaneous labour (14.60 minutes) (p=0.0212). The mean Apgar scores were comparable in two groups. Induced labour is comparable to spontaneous labour regarding fetomaternal outcomes but with increased rate of caesarean deliveries.

Conclusions: Study concluded from our study that in spontaneous group mean duration of labour was less than induced group and most of the patient delivered vaginally. In induced group rate of caesarean was higher and requirement of oxytocin for labour augmentation was also more than spontaneous group. Maternal complications were also found more in induced group than spontaneous group whereas neonatal outcome was similar in both the groups. We observed in our study that induced labour can be a safe procedure among nulliparous women if labour is partographically monitored by WHO modified partograph.


Keywords


Induced labour, Nulliparous women, Spontaneouslabour, World health organization partograph

Full Text:

PDF

References


Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of Labour in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:690-7.

Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of Labour versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:252-63.

Brennand J, Greer I. Induction of labour: New Horizons. Hospital Med. 1998;59:856-60.

Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labour induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induction of labour. London RCOG Press 1998, Guidance No 16. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:287-93.

Mitchell MD, Flint APF, Bibby J, Arnol JM, Anderson ABM, Turnbull C. Rapid increase in plasma PG concentration after vaginal examination amniotomy. Brit Med J. 1997;2:1183-8.

mathai m. the partograph for the prevention of obstructed labour. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(2):256-69.

Mathews JE, Rajaratnam A, George A, Mathai M. Comparison of two World Health Organization (WHO) partographs. Int J Gynecol. 2007;96(2):147-50.

Yadav P, Verma M, Harne S, Sharma M. Comparison of spontaneous labour with induced labour in nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:4005-8.

Gupta S, Shekhawat U, Mital P, Meena M. To study the fetomaternal outcome and progress of labour among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women (using modified WHO partograph). Sch J App Med Sci. 2014;2(5A):1577-8.

Kumari G, Poonia K, Rani D. Prospective study to assess the fetal and maternal outcome in cases of low risk primigravida in induced versus spontaneous onset of labour. Inter J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;2(3):68-72.

Orji E O and Olabode TO. Comparative study of labour progress and delivery outcome among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph. NJOG. 2008;3(1):24-8.

Singh A, Rao SB, Sherigar B, D’souza R, Soumya R, Kaveri V. Comparison of progress of labour and maternofetal outcome among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:415-8.

Patel, Ojaswini, et al. Comparative study of labour progress and delivery outcome among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women using modified who partograph. J Evolut Med Dent Sci. 2017;6(23):1844.