DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20201809

A study to correlate admission non stress test and immediate post-partum umbilical cord arterial pH with neonatal outcome

Rakhi Nainani, Vivek Athwani, Kumkum Avasthi, Venus Bansal, Pardeep Sharma

Abstract


Background: Continuous electronic fetal monitoring in labour has become a standard practice in developed countries; this may not be possible in low middle-income countries. So, this study was conducted to correlate admission non stress test (NST) and immediate post-partum umbilical cord arterial (UCA) pH with neonatal outcome.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at tertiary care centre in North India. After informed and written consent, 100 pregnant women with singleton live pregnancy of gestational age ≥32 weeks admitted in labour, were subjected to admission NST and immediately after delivery sample for UCA pH was taken. Clinically relevant neonatal outcome was correlated with admission NST and UCA pH. Appropriate statistical tests were used and p-value <0.05 taken as significant.

Results: Admission NST was normal, suspicious, pathological in 67%, 27%, 6% subjects, respectively. Study found statistically significant correlation between admission NST and UCA pH with neonatal outcomes (i.e. fetal distress, need of advanced resuscitation, delayed oral feeding). Fetal distress was seen in 9 newborns, in these 8 delivered by CS and 1 required ventous application. Admission NST had high sensitivity (88.89%) and NPV (98.5%) for detection of fetal distress. The optimal cut off for pH and lactate was 7.25 and 2.55 mmol/L, respectively to predict fetal distress.

Conclusions: Admission NST can be considered as a screening modality to detect fetus in distress and it showed good correlation with umbilical cord arterial pH for predicting short term neonatal outcome.

 


Keywords


Admission non stress test, Fetal distress, Neonatal outcome, Umbilical cord arterial pH

Full Text:

PDF

References


National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline No. 55: Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth, 2007. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK49388/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK49388.pdf. Accessed on 10th June 2016.

Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Fetal Assessment. In: Cunningham FG, (editors). Williams Obstetrics, 24th ed. New York, The McGraw-Hill companies; 2014:335-348.

Haththotuwa R, Muhunthan K, Arulkumaran S. Fetal Surveillance in Labour. In: Bhinde A, editor. Arias Practical Guide to High Risk Pregnancy and Delivery, 4th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier Health Sciences APAC; 2015:346-358.

Prasanna R, Karthikeyan P, Mani M, Paramanantham P, Sekar P. The strength of correlation between umbilical cord pH and early neonatal outcome. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2016;3(1):134-7.

Gurung G, Rana A, Giri K. Detection of intrapartum fetal hypoxia using admission test (AT). N J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;1(2):10-3.

Verma A, Shrimali L. Impact of admission non stress as a screening procedure on perinatal outcome. Int J Med Pharm Sci. 2013;03(05):6-10.

Shrestha P, Misha M, Shrestha S. A prospective study on impact of non-stress test in prediction of pregnancy outcome. Am J Public Health Res. 2015;3(4A):45-8.

Raouf S, Sheikhan F, Hassanpour S, Bani S, Torabi R, Shamsalizadeh N. Diagnostic value of non stress test in latent phase of labor and maternal and fetal outcomes. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7(2):177-82.

Gaikwad V, Puri MS, Pandey P. Labour admission test: an assessment of the test’s value as screening for foetal distress in labour. Inter J Applied Res. 2015;1(13):653-5.

Nikita V, Bhavna K. Labour admission test (LAT) as a predictor of intrapartum fetal distress. Panacea J Med Sci. 2016;6(1):26-30.

Dellinger EH, Boehm FH, Crane MM. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(1):214-20.

Rahman H, Renjhen P, Dutta S, Kar S. Admission cardiotocography: Its role in predicting foetal outcome in high-risk obstetric patients. The Aus Med J. 2012;5(10):522‐7.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline C: The use of electronic fetal monitoring, 2001. Available at: http://ctgutbildning.se/images/Referenser/NICE-guidelines-FHR-monitoring-2001.pdf. Accessed 2nd June 2016.

Perveen F, Khan A, Ali T, Rabia S. Umbilical cord blood pH in intrapartum hypoxia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015;25(9):667-0.

Kaban A, Cengiz H, Kaban I, Ozcan A, Karakas S. The success of cardiotocography in predicting perinatal outcome. J Clin Exp Invest. 2012;3(2):168-71.

Ahmadpour-Kacho M, Zahedpasha Y, Hagshenas M, Akbarian Rad Z, Sadat Nasseri B, Bijani A. Short term outcome of neonates born with abnormal umbilical cord arterial blood gases. Iran J Pediatr. 2015;25(3):e174.

Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L. The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated sample. BJOG. 2012;119(7):824-31.