DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160697

A retrospective study to evaluate etiological factors associated with intrauterine fetal death at tertiary referral centre

Shweta Patel, Manik Sirpurkar, Meghraj Singh Patel

Abstract


Background: Amongst various community health indicators available for measurement of quality and impact of health services in developing countries, perinatal mortality finds its position as being one of the top most single indicators even today. In order to have a decrease of the fetal mortality rate, it is necessary to know the etiology of fetal death and its associated risk factors in different populations. Thus the purpose of this study was to investigate about the prevalence, patient profile, socio-demographical and etiological risk factors associated with fetal losses beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy in our hospital.

Methods: This study was conducted at Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal, India. Retrospective data of all the cases with ≥24 weeks gestation with intrauterine fetal death, admitted in the study period (November 2010- December 2015) were collected (n=51). All socio-demographic, antenatal and intrapartum risk factors associated with IUFD were recorded in proforma and statistical analysis done.

Results: Total numbers of births in the study period were 1410, out of which fetal losses beyond 24 weeks of gestation occurred in 51 cases. This gave the perinatal mortality rate for our hospital as 36.17/1000 live births. This rate is much more than the national figure quoted by the central government in 2012 as 28/1000 live birth. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were the most commonly responsible factor (27.45%) in the study group followed by congenital malformations (9.80%). In 11.76% cases cause was not explained.

Conclusions: It is a well-established fact that adequate antenatal care is associated with better pregnancy outcome, but universal antenatal care is not the protocol in our area, reasons being ignorance, illiteracy, lack of awareness of importance of antenatal care, poverty and non-availability of health care facilities/skilled personnel/infrastructure/transport. Health education and emphasis on the need of each and every delivery being institutional under supervision of appropriate personnel needs to be propagated in the community aggressively. This only will help in reducing a number of preventable fetal deaths and huge loss of our national assets

Keywords


Intrauterine fetal death, Fetal demise, Still born

Full Text:

PDF

References


Richardus JH, Graafmans WC, Verloove-Vanorick, SP. Mackenbach JP. The perinatal mortality rate as an indicator of quality of care in international comparisons. Med Care. 1998;36(1):54-66.

Clinical practice guideline: investigation and management of late fetal intrauterine death and stillbirth, institute of obstetrician and gynecologists, Royal College of physicians Ireland, and Directorate of strategies and clinical programmed, health service executive. October 2011-revised 2013; Version 1.0, guideline no. 4.

Estimates of mortality indicators-Census of India website-vital statistics. Chapter 4, pp 81, statement 51, 2012.

Jahanfar Sh, Ghiyasi P, Haghani H. Risk factors related to intra uterine fetal death in Iran: a case control study. Shiraz E-Medical J. 2005;6(3&4):1-14.

lLu JR, Mccowan L. A comparison of the perinatal society of Australia and Newzealand-perinatal death classification systems and relevant condition at death stillbirth classification systems, Aust NZ Obstet Gynecol. 2009:49(5):467-71.

Goyal Lajya,D Parveen Rajori, Verbal Autopasy of 115 cases of Intrauterine fatal Death .Indian Journal of Public health research and Developement,Vol.4 Issue 1. 2013, Pg 147-152.

Bairwa M, Rajput M, Sachdeva S. Modified kuppuswamy's socioeconomic scale: social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38:185-6.

Choudhary A, Gupta V. Epidemiology of intrauterine fetal deaths: a study in tertiary referral centre in Uttarakhand. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13(3):03-6.

Singh N, Pandey k, Gupta N, Arya A, Pratap C, Naik R. A retrospective study of 296 cases of intra uterine fetal deaths at a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(2):141-6.

Patel S, Thaker R, Shah P, Majumder S. Study of causes and complications of intra uterine fetal death (IUFD). Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gyneco. 2014;3(4):931-5.

Informing equitable health policy reform: policy implementation assessment inspires action in Uttarakhand, India, 2010. Available at http://www.healthpolicyinitiative.com/Publications/Documents/1156_1_Uttarakhand_Final_Brief_FINAL_5_31_10_acc.pdf . Accessed on 25 February 2016.

Khashoggi TU. Epidemiology of intrauterine foetal deaths in Saudi Arabia: Kkuh experience. Biomed Res. 2005;16:59-64.

Tamrakar SR, Chawla CD. Intrauterine foetal death and its probable causes: two year experience in Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2012;10(4):44-8.

Korde NV, Gaikwad P. Causes of stillbirth. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2008;58(4):314-7.

Kotweg FJ, Gordjin SJ, Timmer A, Holm JP, Ravise JM, Erwichh JJ. A placental cause of intrauterine fetal death depends on the perinatal mortality classification used. Placenta. 2008;29(1):71-80.

Shaaban A Al Saleh LA, Alwafi BM, Al Raddi RM. Associated risk factors with ante-partum intra-uterine fetal death. Saudi Med J. 2006;(1):76-9.