Partial uterine perforation and ovarian embedment of misplaced intrauterine device: a case report

Authors

  • Abhishek Kaushik Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  • Dalpat S. Rajpurohit Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  • Kirti Chaturvedy Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  • Sunil Vishnoi Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  • Anish H. Panduranga Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  • Asaf Ali K. Kammar Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  • Girija Nandvanshi Department of Radiodiagnosis, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205256

Keywords:

Misplaced IUD, Ultrasound, Ovary, Abdominal pain, Laparotomy

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are the commonest form of contraceptive method in use globally. IUDs like other methods of contraception may be associated with its own complications. The major risk includes uterine perforation with embedment, migration, and/or expulsion. A 35 year old female who had a history of postpartum IUD insertion 10 years ago was referred to our institute with complains of severe lower abdominal pain and vomiting since 10 days. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TAS/TVS) were done. Ultrasound led to the final diagnosis of ovarian embedment of the IUD. Laparotomy with IUD removal was successfully performed. This case report highlights one of the rare complications of IUD migrating to the left ovary in a patient presenting with lower abdominal pain. In a patient with history an IUD insertion in situ, lower abdominal pain and missing threads on examination should wary the gynaecologist to the possibility of total or partial transmigration of the device into the pelvis or abdomen.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:184-96.

Mustafa M. Erosion of an intrauterine contraceptive device through the bladder wall causing calculus: Management and review of the literature. Urol Int. 2009;82:370-1.

Özdemir H, Mahmutyaz CO, Lu K, Tanr Verdi H. Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the ovary. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32(2):91-4.

Rovati M, Raveglia F, Baisi A, De Simone M, Cioffi U. Ovarian transmigration of intrauterine device. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42:1889-90.

Verma U, Verma N. Ovarian embedding of a transmigrated intrauterine device: A case report and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:275-8.

Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981;36:335-53.

Tatum HJ. Intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:1000-23.

Ortiz ME, Croxatto HB, Bardin CW. Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51(12):42‐51.

Gemzell-Danielsson K, Berger C, Lalitkumar PGL. Emergency contraception – Mechanisms of action. Contraception. 2013;87:300-8.

Rosen E. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: a method of localization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1965;93:896-7.

Millen A, Austin F, Berenstein G. Analysis of 100 cases of missing IUD strings. Contraception. 1978;18:485-95.

Valle RF, Sciarra JJ, Freeman DW. Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine devices with missing Wlaments. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:55-60.

Schoenfeld A, Pardo J, Engelstein D, Ovadia J, Servadio C. Bladder perforation by an intrauterine device. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991;19:175-7.

Carson SA, Gatlin A, Mazur M. Appendiceal perforation by Copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:586-7.

Heartwell SF, Schlesselman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:31-6.

Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices-a new look. WHO Population Reports, Geneva. World Health Organization, 1989.

Mederos R, Humaran L, Minervini D. Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report. Int J Surg. 2008;6:60-2.

Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception. 1998;57:251-5.

Adoni A, Ben Chenrit A. The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception. 1990;43:77-81.

Levsky JM, Herkovits M. Incidental detection of a transmigrated intrauterine device. Emerg Radiol. 2005;11(5):312-4.

Bartalena T, Pascali E, Rinaldi MF, Marasco R, Bassi F, Alboni C, Gavelli G. Transmigrated intrauterine device discovered 17 years after its insertion. Australas Radiol. 2007;51:284-6.

Pirvany IR, Boddy K. Colonic Wstula caused by a previously inserted intrauterine device. A case report. Contraception. 1997;56:337-9.

Serryan RFM. Endoscopic removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices. In: van der Pas HFM, Dieben TOM (eds) State of the art of the IUD, 1st edn. Kluwer, London. 1989;173-217.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-26

Issue

Section

Case Reports