DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160851

Partogram: clinical study to assess the role of Partogram in primigravidae in labor

Manjulatha VR, Anitha GS, Nirmala Shivalingaiah

Abstract


Background: Good obstetrician must always be alert to detect any sign and symptoms of abnormal labor. Prolongation of labor presents a picture of mental anguish, physical morbidity and may lead to surgical intervention. The goal of this study is to use partograph to monitor labor, initiate uterine activity that is sufficient to produce cervical change and fetal descent while avoiding uterine hyperstimulation, hypostimulation and fetal distress and provide timely surgical intervention where required.

Methods: Total of 100 primigravidae, who were booked with us till term were selected for the study and partograph recordings were commenced at 4 cm dilatation. Close foetal and maternal monitoring was done throughout the labour and Partogram was plotted to detect any deviation from normal course.

Results: Based on the Partogram findings the patients were grouped into “before alert line” and “between alert and action line” the mode of delivery in these patients was studied. Of the 42% of women who came into this group, 52.3% underwent cesarean delivery, 42.5% had instrumental deliveries and the remaining had vaginal deliveries.

Conclusions: This study shows that using the Partogram improves the quality of delivery care, since it permits to identify dystocia and make logical and effective interventions. It reduces unnecessary strain on mothers by reducing total duration of labour, without any increased foetal morbidity and mortality. If accepted as routine procedure, it will be suitable in all situations where the labour room remains busy and congested day and night for better and more efficient management of labour.

Keywords


Partogram, Alert line, Action line, Labour

Full Text:

PDF

References


Van Bogaert LJ. Revising the primigravida partogram. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279(5):643-7.

Lavender T, Hart A, Smyth RM. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD005461.

Windrim R, Seaward PG, Hodnett E, Akoury H, Kingdom J, Salenieks ME. A randomized controlled trial of a bedside Partogram in the active management of primiparous labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(1):27-34.

Javed I, Bhutta S, Shoaib T. Role of partogram in preventing prolonged labour. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007;57(8):408-11.

Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):295-302.

Sizer AR, Evans J, Bailey SM, Wiener JA. Second-stage partogram. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:678-83.

Rocha IM, de Oliveira SM, Schneck CA, Riesco ML, da Costa AS. The Partogram as an instrument to analyse care during labour and delivery. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43(4):875-83.

Alfirevic Z, Edwards G, Platt J. The impact of delivery suite guidelines on intrapartum care in “standard primigravida”. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;115(1):28-31.

Sadler LC, Davidson T, Mc Cowan LME. A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107:909-15.

Friedman EA. Primigravida labour: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynaec. 1955;6:569.

Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour - the alert line for detecting abnormal labour. Journal of Obstet and Gynaec of the British Commonwealth. 1972;79:599.

Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour- the action line for detecting abnormal labour. Journal of Obstet and Gynaec of the British Commonwealth. 1972:79.

WHO. World Health Organization Partogram in management of labour. The Lancet. 1994;1399-404.

WHO. Training modules 11. The use of the Partograph (also known as Partogram). Essential Antenatal, Perinatal and Postpartum Care. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation. 2002:184-94.

O’Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active management of labour as an alternative to caesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:485-90.

Friedman EA. An objective approach to the diagnosis and management of abnormal labour. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1972;48:842.

Friedman EA. Labour: clinical evaluation and management, 2nd ed. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1978.

Hendricks CH, Brenner WE, Kraus G. Normal cervical dilation pattern in late pregnancy and labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;106:1065-82.

Beazley JM, Kurjak A. Influence of a partograph on the active management of labour. Lancet. 1972;2(7773):348-51.

Studd J, Clegg DR, Sanders RR, Hughes AO. Identification of high risk labours by labour nomogram. Br Med J. 1975;7:545-7.

Studd JWW. Partograms and normograms in the management of primigravida labour. Br Med J. 1973;IV:451-5.