DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204284

A clinical study of primary caesarean section at a tertiary care hospital in coastal city: an observational study

Chaitanya K. T., Lakshmi Manjeera M.

Abstract


Background: Caesarean section represents the most significant operative intervention in obstetrics and its development and application has saved the lives of countless mothers and infants. However there has been a steady increase in the rate of caesarean sections worldwide. In this study, we aim to find the primary caesarean section rates and strategies to cut it down.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study done from January 2018 to June 2019 at Justice K. S. Hegde Charitable Hospital, Deralakatte, Mangaluru which included 379 cases of primary cesarean sections. All patients undergoing primary caesarean section with gestational age >28 weeks confirmed by dates, clinical examination and ultrasound were included in this study. Patients who had undergone previous caesarean section or were less than 18 years of age or were less than 28 weeks of gestation were excluded from the study.

Results: In this study the rate of primary caesarean section was found to be 14.5% and the majority of the study subjects belonged to the age group of 18-27 years (62.3%). With respect to parity, primigravida were high in number (71.2%), followed by multigravida. The number of emergency caesarean sections were (79%) more than elective (21%). The most common intra-operative complication was post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) in 2.8% and the most common postoperative complication was wound gape in 2.1%.

Conclusions: Maximum efforts should be made to allow progression of vaginal delivery in primigravida which helps us to bring down the primary caesarean rate.


Keywords


Caesarean, Post-partum haemorrhage, Primigravida

Full Text:

PDF

References


Stirrat G. The place of caesarean section. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynecol. 1998;10:177-83.

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2012. Nat Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62(9):1-67.

Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of caesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(613):2-10.

US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health. Caesarean child birth. Publication no. 82-2067;1981.

Datta K, Singh P, Chopra N. Retrospective analysis of indications of primary caesarean sections done at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8:3161-7.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):693-711.

Sethi P, Vijaylaxmi S, Shailaja G, Bodhare T, Devi S. A study of primary cesarean section in multigravidae. Perspect Med Res. 2014;2:3-7.

Mande S, Kadam S, Dank G, Shiradakar S. Study of primary caesarean section in light of indications. Int J Recent Trends Sci Tech. 2016;17(3):241-4.

Rajbhanadary S, Shrivastava VR. Study of indications and post-operative complications of primary caesarean section in tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):835-40.

Moni M, Thanganadar AT, Yesubaktan SJ. A study on obstetric profile of mothers undergoing primary caesarean section and their neonatal outcome in a tertiary care centre, South Kerala. Int J Biomed Res. 2015;6(12):835-8.

Jain M, Patel A. A cross sectional study of rate, indications and complications of primary caesarean section. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:1814-9.

Rao JH, Rampure N. Study of primary caesarean section in multiparous women. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(24):4414-8.

Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Laughon SK. Primary caesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):33-40.