Comparison of analgesic efficacy of intramuscular tramadol and pethidine in labour

Authors

  • G. Vinaya Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koppal Institute of Medical sciences, Koppal, Karnataka, India
  • S. M. Surekha Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koppal Institute of Medical sciences, Koppal, Karnataka, India
  • Shivaganga Chiniwal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koppal Institute of Medical sciences, Koppal, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204313

Keywords:

Labour analgesia, Primigravidae, Tramadol, Pethidine

Abstract

Background: Labour pain is among the most severe pain experienced by women. It is unpleasant and distressing to the parturient. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intramuscular tramadol and pethidine in labour.

Methods: The prospective study conducted in SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Department of OBG, from December 2013 to November 2014. The study was a study of the parturients admitted in the labour theatre. Written and informed consent was taken from all the patients enrolled in the study. One hundred parturient at term in active labour were randomly assigned to one of the two groups to receive intramuscularly either tramadol 100 mg or pethidine 75 mg.

Results: Results were comparable in terms of maternal age, maternal weight and neonatal weight. Proportion of cases with satisfactory to good pain relief was 74% in the tramadol group and 78% in the pethidine group. Nausea and/or vomiting (12% versus 8%), fatigue (6% versus 4%) and drowsiness (8% versus 4%) were significantly high in the pethidine group than the tramadol group(p<0.05). The drugs used did not appear to influence the mode of delivery. Proportion of cases with non-reassuring foetal heart rate was high in the pethidine group. Meconium stained liquor was equally seen in both the groups and there were no incidence of neonatal respiratory depression in any of the groups.

Conclusion: Tramadol is an equally effective labour analgesic as pethidine with less maternal and perinatal side effects.

References

American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Number 36, July 2002. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;78(3):321-35.

Nagaria T, Acharya J. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006, 56: 406 409.

Horsager R, Roberts S, Rogers V, Santiago-Munoz, Worley K, Hoffman B. Normal Labour. In: Williums Obstetrics 24th edition. McGrawHill Education. 2014.

Veigus OA. Tramadol in labour pain in primiparous patients-A prospective comparative clinical trial. E.J. Obst & Gynec & Reprod Biology. 1993;49:131-5.

Fieni S, Angeri F, Kaihura CT. Perinatal effects of 2 analgesics, Tramadol chlorhydrate and Mepiridine chlorhydrate, when used during labour. Acta Biomed Ateneo Permense. 2000;(71)1:397-400.

Keskin HL, Aktepe Keskin. Pethidine versus tramadol for pain relief during labour. International J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82(1):11-6.

Jain. Analgesic efficacy of intramuscular opioids versus epidural analgesia in labour. Int J Gynecol & Obstet. 2003;83(1):19-27.

Fieni S, Angeri F, Kaihura CT. Perinatal effects of 2 analgesics, Tramadol chlorhydrate and Mepiridine chlorhydrate, when used during labour. Acta Biomed Ateneo Permense. 2000;(71)1:397-400.

Heever HT, Keela CA. Method of testing analgesia in man. Lancet. 1948;1:683.

Ward ME. Acute pain and the obstetric patient: Recent developments in analgesia for labor and delivery. In: Molloy AR, Poer I (editors). Acute and chronic pain. International Anesthesiology Clinics, USA. Lippincott Raven. 1997;83-8.

Williams Obstetrics, 24th Edition. Normal labour, Obstetric Analgesia & Anaesthesia; chapter 24

Brunton L, Chabner BA, Knollman B. Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Section III, Drugs acting on the CNS, 12th edition. 2011: 360-373.

Feini S, Angeri CT, Kaihura. Evaluation of peripartum effects of 2 analgesics- mepiridine and tramadol used in labour. Acta Biomedl Ateno Permense. 2000;(71):397-400.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles