Incisional surgical site infections in obstetric and gynecological procedures in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India

Authors

  • Savita Chandra Era's Lucknow Medical College & Hospital Era University,Lucknow, India
  • Shodashi Saxena Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Era’s Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205227

Keywords:

Incisional surgical site infections, Major obstetric and gynecological procedures, Episiotomy

Abstract

Background: To find the incidence of incisional surgical site infection (ISSI) in obstetric and gynecological procedures, the risk factors, the microbial spectrum, the antibiotic sensitivity and the impact on the hospital stay. Methods: A prospective observational study was done under the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Era’s Lucknow medical college and hospital. All consecutive patients who underwent caesarean section, vaginal delivery with episiotomy, laparotomy, and hysterectomy were included in this study. Laparoscopic surgeries were excluded. Results; In this series of 646 surgeries, 6.18% developed ISSI. In the category of major surgeries, the ISSI rate was 8.89%. Amongst the 185 episiotomies 1.6% gaped. Anemia, diabetes mellitus, excess body weight, emergency or elective surgery, rapid built up of hemoglobin with blood transfusion, previous caesarean scar and tobacco intake were the risk factors identified. Coagulase negative staphylococcus was the dominant microbe. Antibiotic sensitivity to linezolid was found in 50% of the ISSI cases followed by amikacin, clindamycin and some others. The mean hospital stay was 13 days while the maximum was 26 days.

Conclusions: The study established the current status of incisional surgical site infections, identified the risk factors, the microbial spectrum, the antibiotic sensitivity and the need for further studies using a preventive approach. 

References

Theific.org.2019. Available from: http://theific.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/025.pdf. Accessed on 11 September 2019.

Wick EC, Hicks C. Bosk CL. Surgical site infection monitoring are two systems better than one? JAMA Surg. 2013:148:1085-6.

Letourneau AR, Calderwood MS, Huang SS, Bratzler DW, Ma A, Yokoe DS. Harnessing claims to improve detection of surgical site infections following hysterectomy and colorectal surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidermiol. 2013:34(12):1321-3.

Bhadauria A, Hariharan C. Clinical study of post-operative wound infections in obstetrics and gynecological surgeries in a tertiary care set up. Int J Reprod Contr Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):631.

Horan T, Gaynes R, Martone W, Jarvis W, Emori T. CDC Definitions of Nosocomial Surgical Site Infections, 1992: A Modification of CDC Definitions of Surgical Wound Infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13(10):606-8.

Lazenby GB, Soper DE. Prevention diagnosis and treatment of gynecological surgical site infections. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010:37:379-89

Gangane N, Tayade S, Kore J, Kakde P. Surveillance of surgical site infections following gynecological surgeries in a rural setup – Lessons learnt. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2019;6(1):58-62.

Valecha SM, Saswade MN: An original research paper on incidence and risk factors for surgical site infections following major abdominal surgeries in obstetrics and gynecology. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet & Gynecol 2017 May: 6(5):1859-1863.

Kamel A, Khaled M. Episiotomy and obstetric perineal wound dehiscence: Beyond soreness. J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;34(3):215-7.

Pathak A, Mahadik K, Swami MB, Roy PK, Sharma M, Mahadik VK et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infections in obstetric and gynecological surgeries from a teaching hospital in rural India. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:66.

Myles TD, Gooch J, Santolya J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious mobidityin patients who undergo cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2002:100:959-64.

Chelmow D, Huang E, Strohbehn K. Closure of the subcutaneous dead space and wound disruption after caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002:11:403-8.

Shrestha A, Pradhan N. Analysis of the risk factors and microbial etiology of surgical site infections following lower segment caesarean section. Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;41(1):15.

Cardoso Del Monte M, Pinto Neto A. Post discharge surveillance following caesarean section: The incidence of surgical site infection and associated factors. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(6):467-72.

Pandit A, Sharma P, Yangzom K. Incidence of caesarean wound infection in Patan Hospital Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2003;42(149):280-3.

Bhartiya N, Gupta M, Jain S, Saini V. Anemia: A Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection Following Caesarean Section. Indian Obstet Gynecol. 2018;8(1):8-15.

Narang R, Nandmer G, Sapkal R. Factors affecting post-operative wound gaping and their outcome in obstetrical and gynecological abdominal surgeries. Int J Reprod Contr Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1530.

Naphade SA, Patole K. Study of surgical site infections following gynecological surgeries in a tertiary care hospital. MVP J Med Sci. 2017;4(2):186-92.

Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK, Gannon C, Napolitano LM. Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res. 2002;103(1):89-95.

Ibrahim M, Moustafa G, Al-Hamid A, Hussein M. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;289(5):981-6.

Fehr J, Hatz C, Soka I, Kibatala P, Urassa H, Smith T et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection in a Tanzanian district hospital:a challenge for the traditional National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Index. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(12):1401-4.

Eriksen HM, Chugulu S, Kondo S, Lingaas E. Surgical Site Infections at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical center. J Hosp Infect. 2003:55:14-20.

Dahiya P, Gupta V, Pundir S, Chawla D. Study of incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after caesarean section at first referral unit. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2016;3(4):1102-4.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles