Placental thickness as a sonographic biomarker for gestational age among singleton pregnancies

Gokul Reshmi Mariappan; Hiremath B. Panchaksharayya; Govardhanan R.

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204821

Authors

Gokul Reshmi Mariappan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Venkateswaraa medical college hospital and Research centre, Ariyur, Pondicherry, India
Hiremath B. Panchaksharayya Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Venkateswaraa medical college hospital and Research centre, Ariyur, Pondicherry, India
Govardhanan R. Department of Radiology, Sri Venkateswaraa medical college hospital and Research centre, Ariyur, Pondicherry, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204821

Keywords:

Gestational age, Placental thickness, Sonographic marker

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to exploring the application of placental thickness as a sonographic marker for determining gestational age among singleton pregnant mothers.

Methods: This longitudinal, observational study was conducted in obstetrics and gynecology department and department of Radiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College and Hospital, Ariyur, Puducherry, in antenatal mothers of 11-40 weeks of gestation from 2018 to 2019. The study included 278 normal singleton pregnant women. The details regarding the socio-demographic variables, relevant clinical history and examination, laboratory investigations and ultrasound report containing gestational age, placental thickness measured at the level of cord insertion were documented in a proforma. The sonographic measurements were made using a grey scale real time ultrasound machine Siemens ACUSON x400 with a convex 2-5 mhz probe.

Results: The study included 278 pregnant women with a mean age of 25.8±44 years. Majority of them were home makers (n=155, 55.7%) and educated (n=257, 92.4%) and primigravida

(n=117, 57.9%).The position of the placenta in majority of the participants was posterior placed (71.6%). The mean gestational age of the studied antenatal women was 28.3±7.2 weeks as per ultrasonogram. Majority of the participants were younger aged between 20 to 30 years of age and very few teenage pregnancies. There was a significant correlation between the gestational age and placental thickness (p<0.001). There was a significant (p<0.001) correlation between placental thickness and femur length (r=0.972).

Conclusions: The placental thickness showed significant positive correlation with the gestational age as measured by ultrasonogram. Hence it can be used as a parameter in determining the gestational age.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Norton ME, Scoutt L, Feldstein VA. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 5th edition. Callen PW, editor. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. 2002;225-65.

Habib FA. Prediction of low birth weight infants from ultrasound measurement of placental diameter and thickness. Ann Saudi Med. 2002;22(5-6):312-14.

Karthikeyan T, Subramaniam RK, Johnson WMS. Placental Thickness and its correlation to gestational age and Foetal growth parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(10):1732-5.

Filly R, Hoddick WK, Mahony BS, Callen PW, Filly RA, et al. Placental thickness. J Ultrasound Med. 1985;4(9):479-82.

Suresh KK, Ajey R, Bhagwat SK. Ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness and its correlation with Femur Length. Int J Anatomy Radiol Surg. 2009;6(1):46-51.

Pant S, Dashottar S. A correlative study to evaluate the gestational age by sonological measurement of placental thickness in normal second and third trimester pregnancy. Int J Adv Med. 2017;4:1638-44.

Jain A, Kumar G, Agarwal U, Kharakwal S. Placental thickness a sonographic indicator of gestational age. J Obstet Gynaecol Ind. 2001;51(3):48-9.

Grannum PA, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity. American J Obstetr Gynecol. 1979;133(8):915-22.