Prevalence and predictors of episiotomy and perineal tear at a tertiary hospital in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria

Peter A. Awoyesuku; Dickson H. John; Basil O. Altraide

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204817

Authors

Peter A. Awoyesuku Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port-Harcourt, Nigeria
Dickson H. John Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port-Harcourt, Nigeria
Basil O. Altraide Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port-Harcourt, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204817

Keywords:

Episiotomy, Perineal tear, Prevalence, Predictors, Tertiary hospital

Abstract

Background: Despite many years of it being practiced, episiotomy has remained a controversial operation. The rate is on the decline in developed countries but remains high in developing countries. This study seeks to determine the prevalence of episiotomy and perineal tear, and to assess the associated factors, at the Rivers state university teaching hospital (RSUTH).

Methods: A retrospective study over a two-year period, from 01 January 2018 to 31 December 2019, was carried out. All women who had singleton spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD) with episiotomy or perineal tear at the RSUTH with complete records were included, those with twin delivery and incomplete data were excluded. Data was retrieved from the birth registers and case notes using a proforma. Information on maternal age, parity, gestational age (GA), type of injury, birth weight, head circumference and Apgar scores were extracted. Data were analyzed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 20.

Results: There were 2150 vaginal deliveries, with 440 (20.5%) receiving episiotomy, while 21 (1.0%) had perineal tear. The mean age±standard deviation (SD) was 29.52±4.97 years, median parity was 1, and mean GA±SD was 37.35±1.71 weeks. The mean birth weight±SD was 3.33±0.52 kg and mean head circumference±SD was 34.76±1.90 cm. There was significant association between maternal parity and fetal birth weight with the occurrence of episiotomy and perineal tears.

Conclusions: The rate of episiotomy and perineal tear was higher than recommended, with an increasing trend. The lower the parity and the higher the fetal birth weight, the likelihood to receive an episiotomy. More efforts are needed to reduce the rate.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Carroli G, Mignini I. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD000081.

Onah HE, Akani CI. Rates and predictors of episiotomy in Nigerian women. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;21:44-5.

World Health Organization (WHO). Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436-7.

Maduma-Butshe A, Dyall A, Garner P. Routine episiotomy in developing countries: Time to change a harmful practice. BMJ. 1998;316(7139):1179-80.

Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismael KM. Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11(11):CD000947.

Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismael KM. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second-degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(6):CD000006.

Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, Medves JM. Episiotomy rates around the world: An update. Birth 2005; 32: 219-23.

Enyindah CE, Fiebai PO, Anya SE, Okpani AO. Episiotomy and perineal trauma prevalence and obstetric risk factors in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2007;16(3):242-5.

World Health Organization (WHO). Care in normal birth, a practical guide [serial on the internet]. 1996. Available at: http://www.who.int/making-pregnancy-safer/document/who-frh-msm-9624/en/. Accessed on: 26 July 2020.

Inyang-Etoh CE, Umoiyoho AJ. The practice of episiotomy in a university teaching hospital in Nigeria. Int J Med Biomed Res. 2012;1:68-72.

Sule ST, Shittu SO. Puerperal complications of episiotomies at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria. East Afr. Med J. 2003;80:351-6.

Ekwempu CC. Maternal injuries. In: Agboola A. ed. Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Medical Students. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Book Plc. 2006;477-80.

Otoide VO, Ogbonmwan SM, Okonofua FE. Episiotomy in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;68(1):13-7.

Ola ER, Bello O, Abudu OO, Anorlu RI. Episiotomies in Nigeria – should their use be restricted? Niger Postgrad Med J. 2002;9(1):13-6.

Chigbu B, Onwere S, Aluka C, Kamanu C, Adibe E. Factors influencing the use of episiotomy during vaginal delivery in South-Eastern Nigeria. East Afr Med J. 2008;85(5):240-3.

Izuka EO, Dim CC, Chigbu CO, Obiora-Izuka CE. Prevalence and predictors of episiotomy among women at first birth in Enugu, South-East Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4:928-32.

Hembah-Hilekaan SK, Ojabo OA, Audu O, Onche PE, Maanongun MT. Prevalence of episiotomy and perineal lacerations in a University Teaching Hospital, North-Central Nigeria. J Biomed Res Clin Pract. 2018;1(2):142-7.