A randomized study for two techniques of immediate post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in India

Authors

  • Nidhi Gupta Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi-110029, India
  • Renuka Sinha Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi-110029, India
  • Shashi Prateek Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi-110029, India
  • Abha Mangal Department of Community Medicine, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi-110029, India

Keywords:

Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device, CuT 380A, Kelly’s placental forceps, Manual insertion

Abstract

Background: Postpartum women are susceptible for unintended pregnancy in the first postpartum year. They should be counselled by cafeteria approach and those who opt for Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (PPIUCD), it should be inserted in the same sitting. Aims of current study were to compare 1) The technical feasibility in terms of client discomfort, immediate expulsion, perforation and time taken in insertion of the two insertion techniques, Manually vs Kelly's placental forceps. 2) The complications of the two techniques of insertion. 3) The expulsion rates at 1, 3 and 6 months.

Methods: This was a randomized study in which 150 women were recruited. Group A had 75 subjects and insertion of PPIUCD was done manually. Group B had 75 subjects and insertion was done with Kelly’s placental forceps.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the mild discomfort during insertion by either technique. Time taken for insertion was significantly lower in group A. The combined expulsion rate (spontaneous complete expulsion and partial expulsion) at the end of 6 months was 11.9% in group A and 10.5% in group B (not statistically significant). Pain (16% in group A and 12% in group B) was the most common problem encountered by IUD users followed by menstrual problems (10.7% in group A and 8% in group B). There was no significant difference in the complication rate for the two groups (P >0.05).

Conclusions: Manual technique of insertion of PPIUCD is equally good as compared to Kelly’s placental forceps and it has no economic implications for purchasing and maintenance. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Safwat AM, Momen AK, Omar MS, Hossam TS. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Assiut experience. Med Princ Pract. 2003;12:170-5.

Sivin I, Díaz S, Croxatto HB, Miranda P, Shaaban M, Sayed EH. Contraceptives for lactating women: a comparative trial of a progesterone-releasing vaginal ring and the Copper T 380A IUD. Contraception. 1997;55(4):225-32.

Chi I-C, Farr G. Postpartum IUD contraception: a review of an international experience. Adv Contracept. 1989;5:127-46.

Allen RH, Goldberg AB, Grimes DA. Expanding access to intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;201(5):456.e1-5.

Reinpravoon D. Intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;4(4):527-30.

Xu JX, Rivera R, Dunson TR, Zhuang LQ, Yang XL, MaGT, Chi Ic. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. Contraception. 1996;54(1):33-8.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-02

How to Cite

Gupta, N., Sinha, R., Prateek, S., & Mangal, A. (2017). A randomized study for two techniques of immediate post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in India. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3(2), 398–402. Retrieved from https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/938

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles