Comparison of quality parameters in conventional Pap smears made by endocervical brush smear and Ayre spatula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205219Keywords:
Pap smear, Quality parameters, Ayre spatula, Endocervical brushAbstract
Background: Cervical Pap smear is a form of exfoliative cytology and has been widely accepted as a screening tool for cervical cancers. Among the various devices for collecting samples from cervix, wooden Ayre spatula and cytobrush are used commonly. Ayre spatula collects cells from the ectocervix whereas cytobrush from the transformation zone (TZ) and this study compares both techniques.
Methods: A retrospective study was done by comparing two conventional Pap smears from all consecutive samples received in the cytopathology section of department of pathology (n=388); one with Ayre spatula and one with endocervical brush. They were compared for quality parameters like spreading and staining of cells, morphologic preservation, presence of TZ component, degree of inflammation, presence of infection and predominant cell population. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed.
Results: The smears made out of Ayre spatula showed better spreading (p≤0.00001) and staining (p=0.00022) as compared with those made using endocervical brush. However, the morphological preservation was equally comparable in both. The TZ component was significantly higher in the endocervical brush smear (p=0.00001). Inflammation was comparable in both (p=0.1916). Infection was detected more in ectocervical smears (p=0.00001). The cytobrush smears showed a significantly higher detection rate of endocervical cells (p≤0.00001).
Conclusions: Based on our study, we conclude that the use of both Ayre spatula and endocervical brush together ensures higher efficiency than using a single method.
References
Tan SY, Tatsumura Y. George Papanicolaou (1883-1962): Discoverer of the Pap smear. Singapore Med J. 2015;56:586-7.
Nieminen P, Kallio M, Anttila A, Hakama M. Organised vs. spontaneous Pap-smear screening for cervical cancer: A case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:55-8.
Mokobi F. Papanicolaou Staining (Pap stain) for Pap Smear/Pap Test. Online Microbiol and Biol. 2020;2:2-10
Soost HJ, Falter EW, Otto K. Comparison of two Papanicolaou staining procedures for automated prescreening. Anal Quant Cytol. 1979;1:37-42.
Haider G, Parveen Z, Anjum F, Munir A. Pap smear, an important screening tool to detect precancerous stage of carcinoma of cervix. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2013;25:26-7.
Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Pap Test and Bethesda 2014. ACY. 2015;59:121-32.
Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes. Springer Sci Business Media. 2004;220.
Bauman BJ. Use of a cervical brush for Papanicolaou smear collection. A meta-analysis. J Nurse Midwifery. 1993;38:267-75.
Valenzuela P, Martinez P, Santana A, Garrido N, Cano A, Arnanz F. Comparison of cervical smears secured with different instruments. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:262-6.
Soleimani M, Abdali K, Khajehei M, Tabatabaee H, Komar P, Riaz Montazer N. Comparison of pap smear quality with anatomical spatula method and the common method (spatula-cytobrush): a single blind clinical trial. Iran J Cancer Prev. 2012;5(1):33-8.
Buntinx F, Brouwers M. Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studies. BMJ. 1996;313:1285-90.
Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling. Acta Cytol. 1991;35:69-75.
Neinstein LS, Church J, Akiyoshi T. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling. J Adolesc Health. 1992;13:520-3.
O’Mahony D. A comparison of cervical smear adequacy using either the cytobrush or the Ayre spatula: a practice audit. SA Fam Pract. 2006;48:15.
Luzzatto R, Boon ME. Contribution of the Endocervical Cytobrush Sample to the Diagnosis of Cervical Lesions. ACY. 1996;40:1143-7.
