Hysterectomy for benign conditions in a tertiary care centre: a clinical audit

Authors

  • K. Hymavathi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • P. V. Sreeleena Madhuri Department of obstetrics and Gynecology Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore.
  • Maddipudi Brahmini Department of obstetrics and Gynecology Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore.
  • Sakthi Madhubala Department of obstetrics and Gynecology Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210719

Keywords:

Benign gynecological conditions, Haemorrhage, Hysterectomy, Oophorectomy

Abstract

Background: This clinical audit is to determine the indications, type, and outcome of hysterectomy performed for benign gynaecological conditions in two years and to identify the problem or issue (if any) in planning the hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Methods: The present study is a hospital-based prospective study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, a tertiary care centre, Nellore, AP. Six hundred women, who underwent the hysterectomy during the study period are recruited into this study after obtaining hospital ethical committee approval and informed consent. Among the total of 50,450 women attended our OPD for gynaecological complaints, 600 patients underwent the hysterectomy. Thus 9.6% of total gynaecological admissions ended up with the hysterectomy.

Results: The mean age group of the study is 49.07±8.0 years. Majority of women belonged to low socio-economic status. Predominant age group underwent hysterectomy was 40-49 years. Majority (78.2%; 469 cases) of hysterectomies were done in multiparous women. Chief complaints were menstrual irregularities. Abnormal uterine bleeding -leomyoma (AUB-L) (228 cases; 38%) was the most common indication for hysterectomy. Most commonly done procedure was total abdominal hysterectomy TAH (60.5%; 363 cases). 306 cases (51%) had oophorectomy  (beyond the age of 45 years).The various complications (hemorrhage, sepsis etc..) found to happen mainly in hysterectomies done through abdominal route. 95% of hysterectomised histopathological specimen’s histopathology reports correlated with the pre-operative biopsy reports.

Conclusions: In proved benign conditions, women were counselled and encouraged for medical and conservative methods. Hysterectomies should be decided in those situations where the above measures fail and also where it was found to be the definitive management in the first instance. Woman’s option has also to be considered in certain cases. The route of hysterectomy has to be decided case to case basis and choice of the attending clinician. Oophorectomy was decided in the premenopausal women depending on the condition of the ovaries witnessed at the time of surgery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rees M. Menstrual Problems: menorrhagia and primary dysmenorrhea. In Dewhurst’s textbook of obstetrics and gynaecology. Ed Keith Edmond 7th ed. Blackwell publishers’ pp 399-406.

Neela M, Mayonda IT. The hysterectomy story in the UK. J Midlife Health. 2013;4(1):40-1.

2011 Women’s Health Stats and Facts: The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2011. Retrieved on June 23, 2015 Available at http://www.acog.org/-/media/NewsRoom/ mediakit.pdf.

Yakasai IA. Complications of Hysterectomy: A review. British J Sci. 2013;9(2):78-87.

Shridevi AS, Madhusoodana RB, Gayatri L Patil, Renuka. An analysis of elective hysterectomies at a tertiary care center in Karnataka. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019;3(4):68-70.

John CO, Alegbeleye JO, Otoide AO. Foeto-maternal outcome of diabetes in a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. African J Diabetes Med. 2015;23(2).

Amirikia H, Evans TN. Ten-year review of hysterectomies: trends, indications, and risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134(4):431-7.

Rao PMR. To Study the Trends in Hysterectomy in A Tertiary Care Hospital Based On The Indications of Hysterectomy. IOSR J Dental and Medic Sci. 2019;18(4):49-53.

Patil HA, Mahajan SV, Patil A. Histopathological findings in uterus and cervix of hysterectomy specimens. MVP J M Sci. 2015;2(1):26-9.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 89. Elective and risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:231-41.

Sivapragasam V, Patil AB, Rengaswamy CK. “An audit of hysterectomies: indications, clinic pathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens, complications, in a tertiary care centre”. IJRCOG. 2018;7:689-94.

Pandey D, Sehgal K, Saxena A, Hebbar S, Nambiar J, Bhat RG. An audit of indications, complications, and justification of hysterectomies at a teaching hospital in India. Int J Reprodu Med. 2014:2;2014.

Sait K, Alkhattabi M, Boker A, Alhashemi J. Hysterectomy for benign conditions in a university hospital in Saudi Arabia. Anna Saudi Med. 2008;28(4):282-6.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-24

How to Cite

Hymavathi, K., Madhuri, P. V. S., Brahmini, M., & Madhubala, S. (2021). Hysterectomy for benign conditions in a tertiary care centre: a clinical audit. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10(3), 975–981. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210719

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles