DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210727

A prospective study on feto-maternal outcome in patients with premature rupture of membranes at tertiary care center

Patil S. A., Gaikwad B. H., Purohit P., Chintan Upadhyay

Abstract


Background: PROM is associated with increased risk of chorioamnionitis, unfavorable cervix and dysfunctional labour, increased cesarean rates, postpartum hemorrhage and endometritis in the mother. Possible neonatal outcomes in cases of PROM may include respiratory distress syndrome, hypothermia, hypoglycemia, intraventricular hemorrhage, broncho pulmonary dysplasia etc. Objective of this study the maternal and perinatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes at term.

Methods: This prospective study was done among 100 pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes after 37 completed weeks visited at department of obstetrics & Gynecology in RCSM Hospital, Kolhapur during June 2014 and June 2015. Inclusion Criteria was Gestational  age  of  >37  weeks  confirmed  by  dates,  clinical  examination  or ultrasound, cervical dilatation of <3 cms, Lack of uterine contractions for atleast 1 hour from PROM, Single live pregnancy in vertex presentation and PROM confirmed by Direct visualization or Litmus.

Results: Present study found highest number of cases among age group 20-24 years and mean age was 22 years. Almost 70% cases were un-booked. Average duration to PROM to hospital admission was 9.6 hours. Most common maternal outcome was febrile illness Most common perinatal outcome was birth asphyxia and 3 perinatal death.

Conclusions: Pregnancies complicated with PROM should have supervised labor preferably in an institution. Management of each case has to be individualised. A combined effort of obstetrician and neonatalogist is necessary. A good neonatal intensive care unit can be instrumental in reducing the perinatal morbidity and mortality.


Keywords


Fetomaternal Outcome, LSCS, Multigravida, PROM, Primigravida

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amala S, Kumari KL. A Study of Maternal and Perinatal Outcome in Pre Labour Rupture of Membranes at Term. JMSCR. 20‬17;5(11):30225-30230.

Frenette P, Dodds L, Armson BA, Jangaard K. Pretermprelabour rupture of membranes: effect of latency on neonatal and maternal outcomes J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(8):710-7.

Acaia B, Crovetto F, Ossola MW, Nozza S, Baffero GM, Somigliana E, et al. Predictive factors for neonatal survival in women with periviable preterm rupture of the membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(16):1628-34.

Gaikwad BH, Maskar RP. Study of maternal and perinatal outcome in premature rupture of membrane at term pregnancy. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(37):2226-8.

Raghavan SS. Endocervical prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel in premature rupture of membranes. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2001;51:122.

Uma S, Nisha S, Shikha S. A prospective analysis of etiology and outcome of preterm labor. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2007;57(1):48-52.

Naeye R, Peters E. Causes and consequences of premature rupture of fetal membranes. Lancet. 1980;1:192-4.

Nagaria T, Diwan C, Jaiswal J. A study on feto-maternal outcome in patients with premature rupture of membranes. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:4123-7.

Shah M, Sandesara P. Fetomaternal outcome in cases of PROM. Gujarat Med J. 2011;66(1).

Surayapalem S, Cooly V, Salicheemala B. A study on maternal and perinatal outcome in premature rupture of membranes at term. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5368-72.

Devi A, Reddi Rani. Premature rupture of membranes – A clinical study. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1996;46:63.

Singhal P, Singhal AK. Fetomaternal outcome in premature rupture of membranes. Obs Gyna Today. 2002;10:585.

Kamala J, Scaila S. A study of premature rupture of membranes Management and outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2001;51(2):58-60.

Ray P, Sikdar K, Das A, Ghosh T. Study of cases of chorioamniotics followed premature rupture of membranes. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1997;47:136.