Outcome of post caesarian pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital in Udaipur, Rajasthan


  • Archana Sharma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur Rajasthan, India
  • Harshdeep Jadeja Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur Rajasthan, India
  • Preeti Malhotra Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur Rajasthan, India




Cesarian section, TOLAC, VBAC


Background: The prevalence of caesarean section has increased due to a variety of factors such as patient choice and relative safety of the procedure. However in many cases the risk involved in LSCS is still present.

Methods: The present study was designed to evaluate the outcome in cases where VBAC or TOLAC were used for the second pregnancy in a previous LSCS case. The study employed a sample of 60 subjects who were equally divided in two groups who were subjected to elective cesarian and TOLAC.

Results: The results showed that TOLAC did have a better outcome as compared to repeat cesarian in context of maternal and foetal factors.

Conclusions: The practice of TOLAC must be tried as an alternative and can be a viable option for uncomplicated post cesarian deliveries.



Viswanathan M, Visco AG, Hartmann K, Wechter ME, Gartlehner G, Wu JM, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Evidence report/technology assessment. 2006;(133):1.

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1279-95.

Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S. Births: Preliminary Data for 2009. National Statistics Reports. Vol 59. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010.

Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Ratcliffe SJ, Stevens EJ, et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1143-7.

Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probabilit y of morbidity related to a trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:56.e1-6.

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner W, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with trial of labour after prior caesarean delivery. NEJM. 2004;351:2581-9.

Stone C, Halliday J, Lumley J, Brennecke S. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC): a population study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000;14:340-8.

Prabha S, Naralkar M, Prema. Outcome of post cesarean pregnancy in a tertiary care centre in south India. The New Indian Journal of Obgyn. 2020;7(1): 31-5.

Fisler RE, Cohen AC, Ringer SA, Lieberman E. Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section. Birth. 2003;30(2): 83-8.

Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman M, Marshall N, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence report/technology assessment no.191. AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.

Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, Lezotte D, Lynch AM. Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;133(6):1231-8.






Original Research Articles