DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20211142

Role of admission cardiotocography and amniotic fluid index on perinatal outcome in low risk pregnancy at term

Manasi Patnaik, Tejaswini M, Sudhanshu Kumar Rath, Shaik Afrah Naaz

Abstract


Background: Fetal surveillance even in normal or low risk pregnancy is essential to ensure safe parturition with minimum intervention. Cardiotocography (CTG) and clinical estimation of amniotic fluid volume (AFV) measured as amniotic fluid index (AFI) are two tests that are easily available in the labor room and can be used to identify fetal well-being. Our study aimed to evaluate role of admission cardiotocography (CTG) and amniotic fluid index (AFI) on perinatal outcome in low risk pregnancy at term.

Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective observational study. All low risk pregnant women at term admitted to the labor ward in early or established labour between September 2018 and August 2020 were included in the study. They underwent admission CTG and AFI assessment using ultrasonography. All parameters including CTG changes, mode of delivery, AFI, presence of meconium, APGAR score at 1 and 5 mins, need for admission in neonatal ICU and perinatal mortality were recorded. Quantitative data was compared using chi square test.

Results: A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Majority of the women belonged to the age group of 30-35 years. Abnormal CTG showing fetal distress was seen in 105 (58.33%) cases. Non-reactive CTG was significantly associated with meconium stained liqour, requirement for LSCS, still birth, fetal distress, APGAR <7 at 1 and 5min and NICU admission (p<0.001). The association of low AFI with non-reactive CTG had statistically significant impact on perinatal outcomes like low birth weight, requirement for LSCS, fetal distress, APGAR <7 at 1 and 5 mins and NICU admissions.

Conclusions: Admission CTG is a simple non-invasive test that can serve as a screening tool in low risk obstetric population to detect fetal distress already present or likely to develop and prevent unnecessary delay in intervention. Thus, it may help in preventing fetal morbidity and mortality.


Keywords


Amniotic fluid, Cardiotocography, Fetal distress, Meconium

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mehta M, Sau A. Fetal heart rate monitoring. In Editors Roger KF, Thomas JG, Michael PN, Lisa AM. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist. Lippencott Williams and Wilkins; 4th Revised Edition. 2014:75.

Ingemarsson I. In: Intrapartum foetal surveillance. Spencer JAD, Ward RHT, editors. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Electronic foetal monitoring as a screening test. 1993:45-52.

Lekis S, Loghis C, Parayoto N. Use of antepartum and intrapartum cardiography. Clin Exp Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;24:79-81.

Gibb D, Arulkumaran S. Oxford: Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. The admission test: Clinical scenarios Foetal monitoring in practice. 1997:67-72.

Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Ingemarsson E, Tambyraja RL, Ratnam SS. Admission test: a screening test for foetal distress in labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(6):800-6.

Kofinas A, Kofinas G. Differences in amniotic fluid patterns and fetal biometric parameters in third trimester pregnancies with and without diabetes. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(10):633-8.

Magann E, Sandlin A, Ounpraseuth S. Amniotic fluid and the clinical relevance of the sonographically estimated amniotic fluid. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(11):1573-85.

Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, Rutherford SE, Anderson E. Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1987;32(8):601-4.

NICE. Inherited clinical guideline C. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence. 2001.

Rahman H, Renjhen P, Dutta S, Kar S. Admission cardiotocography: its role in predicting foetal outcome in high-risk obstetric patients. Aust Med J. 2012;5(10):522-7.

Kansal R, Goel G, Mangala D, Garg P, Verma K, Geetika. Correlation of admission test with neonatal outcome. Peoples J Scientific Res. 2014;7(1):27-31.

Kumari VR, Indiramani, Chakravarthy K. A comparative study of perinatal outcome in low risk pregnancies with CTG monitoring and intermittent auscultation. J Evolution Med Dental Sci. 2015;4(105):17038-42.

Xavier AA, Pandey D, Dogra L, Lewis LE. Cardiotocography in a perinatal armamentarium: boon or bane? Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:2000-4.

Meena RB, Vyas L, Meena BS, Khandelwal A. Perinatal outcome by admission cardiotocography in low-risk obstetric population. Int J Advance Res Development. 2017; 2(3):13-8.

Das V, Katiyar N, Malik GK. Role of admission test J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2001;51(1):48-50.

Gupta M, Nagar T, Gupta P. Role of cardiotocography to improve perinatal outcome in high risk pregnancy. Int J Contemporary Med Res. 2017;4(4):853-6.

Panda S, Das A, Nowroz HM, Singh AS. Role of admission tests in predicting perinatal outcome: a prospective study. J Preg Child Health. 2015;2:171.