Palm-coein classification of abnormal uterine bleeding and clinicohistopathological correlation

Authors

  • Vimal H. Vasava Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C. U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India
  • Bhavesh B. Airao Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C. U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India
  • Milan R. Shingala Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C. U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20211141

Keywords:

Abnormal uterine bleeding, AUB, Adenomyosis, Classification system, Malignancy, Ovulation, Polyp leiomyoma

Abstract

Background: The aim was to categorize women with AUB as per the PALM-COEIN classification system as this is a step towards cause based diagnosis and focused management of patients. The acronym PALM-COEIN comes from arranging basic categories of the classification system. The PALM group comprises the structural entities, which can be measured visually or by using imaging techniques and histopathology. The COEIN group comprises the non- organic types which cannot be defined by imaging or histopathology.

Methods: The study comprised 350 women of reproductive age with AUB for minimum 3 month time span. It describes and observes AUB in amount, interval and frequency for women attending out-patient Gynaecology department of C. U. Shah Medical College and Hospital, Surendranagar (Gujrat) over a period of 1year from November 17 to October 18. They were assessed on the basis of structured history, physical examination, local pelvis examination, investigations, USG findings and endometrial histopathological report. Cause of AUB was determined and treatment was given to the patient as appropriated by categorization done in agreement with the PALM-COEIN classification.

Results: The most prevalent cause of AUB was ovulatory dysfunction (n=99, 28.2%). Next common cause was leiomyoma (n=90, 25.7%), followed by endometrial causes (n=52, 14.5%), adenomyosis (n=30, 8.5%) not yet classified (n=32, 9.7%), malignancy and hyperplasia (n=28, 8.1%), polyp (n=9, 2.5%), iatrogenic (n=7, 2.2%) and coagulopathy (n=1, 0.3%).

Conclusions: The PALM-COEIN classification helps to practically as certain because of AUB, and there by effectively adopt the correct treatment for AUB patients.

References

Fraser IS, Langham S. Health related quality of life and economic burde no fabnormal uterine bleeding. Expert Rev Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;4:179-89.

Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft PR. An epidemiological survey of symptoms of menstrual loss in the community. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:359-63.

Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS. The flexible FIGO classification concept for underlying causes of abnormal uterine bleeding. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:391-9.

Munro MG, Broder M, Critchley HOD, Matteson K, Haththotu R, Fraser IS. An international response to questions about terminologies, investigation, and management of abnormal uterine bleeding: use of an electronic audience response system. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:436-45.

Fraser IS, Critchley HOD, Broder M, Munro MG. The FIGO recommendation on terminologies and definitions for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:383-90.

Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Broder M, Fraser IS. FIGO working group on menstrual disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in non-gravid women of reproductive age. Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(1):3- 13.

Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS. The FIGO systems for nomenclature and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in there productive years:who needs them? Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;207(4):259-65.

Khrouf M, Terras K. Diagnosis and management of formerly called dysfunctional uterine bleeding” according to PALM-COEINFIGO classification and the new guidelines. Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64:388-93.

Madhra M, Fraser IS, Munro MG, Critchley HOD. Abnormal uterine bleeding: advantages of formal classification to patients, clinicians and researchers Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand. 2014;93:619-25.

Bahamondes L, Ali M. Recent advances inmanaging and understanding menstrual disorders. Prime Rep. 2015;7:33.

Gouri SRS, Lakshmi PV, Rani NG, Kumar NA. Categorization of the causes of AUB according to PALM-COEIN classification. Int J Scientific Study. 2016;4(2):97-9.

Goel P, Rathore SB. PALM-COEIN FIGO classification for diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. Sch J App Med Sci. 2016;4(8A):2771-3.

Qureshi FU, Yusuf AW. Distribution of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding using the new FIGO classification system. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63:973-5.

Ratnani R, Meena N. Aclinico-pathological analysis of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding according to PALM- COEIN classification. JMSCR. 2017;5(09):28196-200.

Sharma JB, Yadav M. New ground breaking International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics’s classification of abnormal uterine bleeding. JM Life Health. 2013;4(1):42-5.

Demirps HD, Ulusoy M, Cailk E, Solmaz U, Gevenal T. Assessment of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive period according to PALM-COEIN classification system. Scient Open Access Journal. 2016;9:45-9.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles