Incidence, indication and complications of primary caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida at secondary care centre

Harshita Verma; Sangeeta Singhal; Zeel Dakshay Shah

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263413

Authors

Harshita Verma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital, Sector-6 Panchkula, Haryana, India
Sangeeta Singhal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital, Sector-6 Panchkula, Haryana, India
Zeel Dakshay Shah Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital, Sector-6 Panchkula, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263413

Keywords:

Caesarean section, Fetal distress, Maternal complications, Multigravida, Neonatal outcomes, Primigravida

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common obstetric surgeries, with rates rising globally beyond the World Health Organization’s recommended 10–15%. Its overuse increases maternal risks like hemorrhage and abnormal placentation and neonatal issues such as respiratory distress. Understanding the incidence and causes of primary CS, especially in primigravida and multigravida, is essential. This study aimed to compare their incidence, indications and maternal-fetal complications at a secondary care hospital.

Methods: This prospective observational included a total of 1200 women were enrolled 600 primigravida (Group A) and 600 multigravidas with previous vaginal deliveries (Group B). Women with prior CS or non-viable pregnancies were excluded. Data on demographics, obstetric history and outcomes were recorded. Mode of delivery, CS indications and complications were analyzed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS v26; p<0.05 was significant.

Results: Of 1200 women, 315 (26.25%) underwent CS, more in primigravida (30.33%) than multigravida (22.17%). Elective CS was higher in Group A (15.0% vs 8.5%), most often for oligohydramnios. Emergency CS was mainly for fetal distress in primigravida (32.61%) and meconium-stained liquor in multigravida (24.39%). PPH was more frequent in multigravida (9.02%). Neonatal outcomes showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: Primary CS was more common in primigravida, especially elective cases. Fetal distress and meconium-stained liquor were leading emergency indications. PPH was higher in multigravida, while neonatal outcomes were comparable. Improved antenatal care and counselling may reduce unnecessary CS, with parity-based interventions enhancing outcomes.

References

Mandi D, Ghosh A, Goswami V. A study to compare the incidence, indications and maternal outcome of primary caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida in a tertiary care centre. Int J Biomed Adv Res 2019;10(9):5248.

Rajput N, Singh P, Verma YS. Study of primary caesarean section in multigravida patients. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(1):185-91.

FG C. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Williams Obst. 2005;5:587-606.

Sethi P, Vijaylaxmi S, Shailaja G, Bodhare T, Devi S. A study of primary caesarean section in multigravidae. Perspect Med Res. 2014;2(2):3-7.

Bhide A. Changing trends of caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1993;43:539-42.

Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Maso G, Dal Pozzo G, Ronfani L, Cegolon A, et al. Understanding factors leading to primary cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005–2015. Scient Rep. 2020;10(1):380.

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(1):1349-57.

Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Aleem HA, Althabe F, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Bjog. 2015;22;123(5):667.

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436-7.

Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing‐Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediat Perin Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98-113.

Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health. 2010;30(1):1-31.

Bamon W, Goswami SN, Roy I, Saikia N. A comparative study of primary caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Shillong, Meghalaya. Sch Int J Obstet Gynec. 2021;4(6):225-40.

Valarmathi S, Mallika S. Analytical study of indications of caesarean section in a Tertiary Medical College, Sivagangai, Tamilnadu. Indian J Obst Gynecol. 2019;7(2):213-6.

Gupta M, Garg V. The rate and indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital at Jaipur, India. Int J Reprod Contracep Obst Gynecol. 2017;6(5):1786-93.

Alagesan SM, Meena M. Comparison of incidences and indications of multi primary caesarean with primi caesarean mothers in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Int J Reprod Contraception, Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(10):4263.

Jain M, Patel A. A cross sectional study of rate, indications and complications of primary caesarean section. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(6):1814-9.

Desai E, Leuva H, Leuva B, Kanani M. A study of primary caesarean section in multipara. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(3):320-4.

Himabindu P, Sundari MT, Sireesha KV, Sairam MV. Primary caesarian section in multipara. IOSR-JDMS. 2015;14(5):22-5.

Birla S, Gupta M, Birla P, Sharma J. Comparison of incidence, indication and complication of primary cesarean section in primigravida and multigravida. Int J Med Sci Edu. 2016;3(3):311-7.

Sharmila G, Nishitha Ch. Study of primary caesarean section in multigravida. Asian Pacific J Health Sci. 2016;3(4):89-94.

Mande S, Kadam S, Dank G, Shiradakar S. Study of primary caesarean section in light of indications. Int J Recent Trends Sci Tech. 2016;17(3):241-4.

Kolawole AO, Onwuhuafua P, Adesiyun G, Oguntayo A, Mohammed-Duro A. Audit of primary caesarean sections in nulliparae seen in ABUTH kaduna. Australian J Basic Appl Sci. 2011;5(6):1088-97.

Suresh YA, Suresh YV. A Prospective Comparative Study of Caesarean Section. International J Pharma Bio Sci. 2017;8(3):890-95.