Uterine artery embolization versus total abdominal hysterectomy as a treatment modality: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in women with uterine fibroids ≤10 cm

Authors

  • Chuni Sangmu Bhutia Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Pratibha Garg Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Manohar Singh Rathore Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263415

Keywords:

Hysterectomy, Minimally invasive treatment, Patient satisfaction, Uterine artery embolization, Uterine fibroids

Abstract

Background: Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumours affecting women of reproductive age. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) is the definitive treatment, while uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive alternative. This study compares clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between UAE and TAH.

Methods: A prospective observational study including 30 women with symptomatic uterine fibroids ≤10cm. Patients were divided into two groups: UAE(n=15) and TAH (n=15). Follow-up was done at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.

Results: UAE showed shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay compared with TAH. Fibroid reduction up to 60% at one year was observed in the UAE group. Psychological well-being improved in 80% of UAE patients and 75% of TAH patients.

Conclusions: UAE is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to hysterectomy for symptomatic fibroids ≤ 10cm with high patient satisfaction and faster recovery.

References

Eltoukhi HM, Modi MN, Weston M, Armstrong AY, Stewart EA. The health disparities of uterine fibroid tumors for African American women: a public health issue. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):194-9.

Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22(6):665-86.

Lee EJ, Park SJ, Kim SC, Kim Y, Joo JK. Effect and safety of diluted vasopressin injection on bleeding during robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: a protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e056145.

Park SJ, Kim SC, Kim Y, Joo JK, Lee EJ. Effect and safety of diluted vasopressin injection on bleeding control during robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in reproductive women with uterine fibroids: a randomized controlled pilot trial (VALENTINE Trial). In Vivo. 2024;38(1):431-6.

Yang J, Fan X, Gao J, Li D, Xu Y, Chen G. Cost effectiveness analysis of total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids in Western China: a societal perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):252.

Martin J, Bhanot K, Athreya S. Complications and reinterventions in uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a literature review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013;36(2):395-402.

Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Jacoby VL, Myers ER. Disparities in fibroid incidence, prognosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2017;44(1):81-94.

Vo NJ, Andrews RT. Uterine artery embolization: a safe and effective, minimally invasive, uterine-sparing treatment option for symptomatic fibroids. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008;25(3):252-60.

Lara C, Lewis G. Does preoperative uterine artery embolization decrease blood loss during total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230(4):S1180.

van der Kooij SM, Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Birnie E, Ankum WM, Reekers JA. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(2):105.e1-13.

Gonsalves C. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of symptomatic fibroids. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008;25(4):369-77.

Psilopatis I, Fleckenstein FN, Collettini F, Can E, Frisch A, Gebauer B, et al. Short- and long-term evaluation of disease-specific symptoms and quality of life following uterine artery embolization of fibroids. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):106.

Anchan RM, Wojdyla D, Bortoletto P, Terry K, Disler E, Milne A, et al. A comparative analysis of health-related quality of life 1 year following myomectomy or uterine artery embolization: findings from the COMPARE-UF Registry. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023;32(4):423-33.

Manyonda I, Belli AM, Lumsden MA, Moss J, McKinnon W, Middleton LJ, et al. Uterine-artery embolization or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2020;383(5):440-51.

Berkane N, Moutafoff-Borie C. Impact of previous uterine artery embolization on fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(3):242-7.

Smith WJ, Upton E, Shuster EJ, Klein AJ, Schwartz LB. Patient satisfaction and disease-specific quality of life after uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1697-703.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Bhutia, C. S., Garg, P., & Rathore, M. S. (2026). Uterine artery embolization versus total abdominal hysterectomy as a treatment modality: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in women with uterine fibroids ≤10 cm. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(10), 3845–3851. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263415

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles