Mature cystic teratoma simulating caesarean scar pregnancy: a rare case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263464Keywords:
Mature cystic teratoma, Dermoid cyst, Caesarean scar pregnancy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diagnostic dilemma, Ovarian neoplasmAbstract
Mature cystic teratomas (dermoid cysts) are common benign ovarian germ cell tumours that usually demonstrate characteristic radiological features. However, coexisting pelvic pathology and altered postoperative anatomy may occasionally result in misleading imaging appearances, posing a significant diagnostic challenge. Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening form of ectopic pregnancy that requires prompt recognition and appropriate management. We report the case of a 30-year-old multiparous woman with a previous lower segment caesarean section who presented with heavy prolonged menstrual bleeding and foul-smelling vaginal discharge. Initial ultrasonography suggested a left ovarian dermoid cyst with bilateral hydrosalpinx. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at a tertiary centre demonstrated an extrauterine gestational sac containing fetal skeletal structures communicating with the uterine cavity through a previous caesarean scar, raising suspicion of CSP. The absence of pregnancy-related symptoms and a negative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin level prompted further clinical evaluation. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a left ovarian mature cystic teratoma densely adherent to the previous caesarean scar, bilateral pyosalpinx, extensive pelvic adhesions, and a uterine scar defect with scar endometriosis. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis. This case illustrates an unusual diagnostic pitfall in which the combined presence of calcified components within the dermoid cyst, a previous caesarean scar defect, dense pelvic adhesions, bilateral pyosalpinx, and scar endometriosis created an MRI appearance closely resembling a CSP. Careful clinicoradiological correlation and integration of laboratory findings remain essential to avoid misdiagnosis and guide appropriate surgical management.
References
Shareef S, Ettefagh L. Dermoid cyst. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
Comerci JT Jr, Licciardi F, Bergh PA, Gregori C, Breen JL. Mature cystic teratoma: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 517 cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(1):22-8.
Caspi B, Appelman Z, Rabinerson D, Zalel Y, Tulandi T, Shoham Z. The growth pattern of ovarian dermoid cysts: a prospective study in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(3):501-5.
Kaijser J, Bourne T, Valentin L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Timmerman D et al. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer using simple rules and International Ovarian Tumour Analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(1):9-20.
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Maymon R, Arslan AA, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(4):383-95.
Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1373-81.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India 2019-21. Mumbai: IIPS. 2021.
World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: WHO. 2015.
Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Borghese B, Dousset B, Fauconnier A, Darai E. Caesarean scar endometriosis: a multicentre study of diagnosis and management. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(3):470-7.
Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(5):261-75.
Singh P, Kapur K, Singla S, Noor N. Dermoid cyst adherent to previous caesarean scar mimicking scar pregnancy: a diagnostic dilemma. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):QD06-7.
Kłobuszewski B, Szmygin M, Nieoczym K, Kłobuszewska O, Woźniak S, Pyra KK. Advances in treating cesarean scar pregnancy: a comprehensive review of techniques, clinical outcomes, and fertility preservation. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30:e943550.
Kaur A, Gajera A, Woldanski P. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a do-not-miss diagnosis. Radio Graphics. 2024;44(7):e230199.
Comune R, Miele V, La Porta M. MRI assessment of cesarean scar pregnancies: a case series. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7241.
Choudhary S, Garg R, Madan S. Scarred for life: a review of cesarean section scar pregnancy and potential pitfalls in diagnosis. J Ultrasound. 2023;26(4):849-60.
Wu Q, Liu X, Zhu L. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the detection of cesarean scar pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(48):e27532.
Miller R, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(3):B9-20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alisha Goyal, Tuhina Gupta, Manju Puri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.