Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in antenatal women and its correlation with maternal outcomes: a tertiary hospital based prospective study

Authors

  • Aditi Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tirath Ram Shah Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Nishi Makhija Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tirath Ram Shah Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Reema Jain Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tirath Ram Shah Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Juhi Srivastava Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tirath Ram Shah Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Yukti Sharma Department of Microbiology, Tirath Ram Shah Hospital, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263430

Keywords:

Pregnancy, Bacterial vaginosis, Preterm birth, Maternal outcomes, PROM, Nugent score

Abstract

Background: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vaginal infection in reproductive-aged women, with heightened risks during pregnancy, including preterm labor and low birth weight. Despite its association with poor outcomes, routine screening in pregnancy is not universally implemented, particularly in India, where regional data on BV and pregnancy outcomes are limited. Present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of BV in antenatal women and assess its impact on maternal outcomes.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Tirath Ram Shah Trust Hospital, Delhi, over one year (April 2025 to March 2026). Two hundred pregnant women (singleton pregnancies, <20 weeks gestation) were enrolled. BV was diagnosed using Nugent’s criteria via Gram-stained vaginal smears. Maternal outcomes (abortions, preterm labor, PROM, IUD, chorioamnionitis) were tracked until delivery.

Results: Of the 200 women, 18% were BV-positive. No significant association was found between age, gravida, or mode of delivery and BV. However, BV was significantly linked with PROM (11.1% versus 0.6%) and PPROM (19.4% versus 2.4%). Preterm birth was also higher in BV-positive women (22.2% versus 2.4%).

Conclusions: BV in pregnancy was associated with higher risks of PROM, PPROM, and preterm birth. These findings suggest that routine screening and management of BV in antenatal care could help mitigate adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

References

Kairys N, Carlson K, Garg M. Bacterial vaginosis. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024.

Abbe C, Mitchell CM. Bacterial vaginosis: a review of approaches to treatment and prevention. Front Reprod Health. 2023;5:1100029.

Abou Chacra L, Fenollar F, Diop K. Bacterial Vaginosis: What Do We Currently Know? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;11:672429.

Africa CW, Nel J, Stemmet M. Anaerobes and bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: virulence factors contributing to vaginal colonisation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(7):6979-7000.

Denney JM, Culhane JF. Bacterial vaginosis: a problematic infection from both a perinatal and neonatal perspective. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(4):200-3.

Gupta A, Singh S, Chaudhary R, Nigam S. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (<28 weeks) and its effect on pregnancy outcome: a study from a western up city. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2016;3(2):90-4.

Mathew R, Kalyani J, Bibi R, Mallika M. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in antenatal women. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001;44(2):113-6.

Ibrahim SM, Bukar M, Galadima GB, Audu BM, Ibrahim HA. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women in Maiduguri, North-Eastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(2):154-8.

Bhakta V, Aslam S, Aljaghwani A. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: prevalence and outcomes in a tertiary care hospital. Afr J Reprod Health. 2021;25(1):49-55.

Jain R. Role of bacterial vaginosis in preterm labor - a prospective study. Int J Med Res Rev. 2016;4(4):543-9.

Kiran CK, Kandati J, Ponugoti M. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in preterm and termlabour: a one-year study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obs Gynecol. 2017;6(6):2292-6.

Sethi N, Narayanan V, Saaid R, Ahmad Adlan AS, Ngoi ST, Teh CSJ, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and adverse outcomes of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):40.

Das TR, Jahan S, Begum SR, Akhtar MF. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery. Mymensingh Med J. 2011;20(1):115-20.

Shahgheibi S, Seied-Al-Shohadaie F, Seied-Al-Shohadaie A, Ghaderi E. Complications of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2009;25(6):953-6.

Ng BK, Chuah JN, Cheah FC, Mohamed Ismail NA, Tan GC, Wong KK, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Front Surg. 2023;10:1084867.

Wu J, Zhu X, Tang B, Wu J, Wei F, Wang X, et al. Effects of bacterial vaginosis treatment during pregnancy on maternal-fetal outcome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025;307:175-83.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Singh, A., Makhija, N., Jain, R., Srivastava, J., & Sharma, Y. (2026). Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in antenatal women and its correlation with maternal outcomes: a tertiary hospital based prospective study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(10), 3949–3954. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263430

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles