A prospective observational study comparing two embryo-transfer catheters and techniques to evaluate their impact on pregnancy outcomes

Sowmya Mahesh; Rita Bakshi

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263437

Authors

Sowmya Mahesh IVF and Reproductive Medicine at Birla Fertility and IVF, New Delhi, India
Rita Bakshi Risaa IVF and EPIA Centre, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263437

Keywords:

Embryo transfer, IVF, ICSI, Embryo transfer catheter, Edwards-Wallace catheter, Easy Flex metal catheter, Assisted reproductive technology, Pregnancy outcome

Abstract

Background: The procedure of embryo transfer (ET) is a critical determinant of success in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART), and the choice of transfer catheter may influence pregnancy outcomes. Although soft ET catheters are generally preferred because of their atraumatic design, metallic catheters may offer technical advantages in selected cases with challenging cervical anatomy. This prospective observational study compared pregnancy outcomes between the Edwards-Wallace soft catheter and the Easy Flex metal catheter.

Methods: Thirty-two women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/ in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment at Risaa IVF Centre, New Delhi, between November 2025 and May 2026 were enrolled. Patients were allocated into two equal groups (n=16 each) based on the ET catheter selected according to findings from a mock ET. Baseline demographic characteristics, ovarian reserve parameters, stimulation characteristics, embryological outcomes, and β-hCG confirmed pregnancy rates were compared. The primary outcome was a positive pregnancy test measured by serum β-hCG test performed 14 days after ET.

Results: Baseline clinical characteristics, ovarian reserve markers (AFC and AMH), gonadotropin requirements, oocyte yield, fertilization rates, blastocyst formation and development, and the number of embryos transferred were same among the two groups and was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Positive serum β-hCG test was observed in 8 of 16 patients (50.0%) in the Easy Flex metal catheter group and 7 of 16 patients (43.8%) in the Edwards-Wallace group. No statistically significant difference in pregnancy outcomes was identified between the groups (OR=1.29, p=1.000).

Conclusions: The Easy Flex metal catheter and the Edwards-Wallace soft catheter demonstrated comparable clinical performance with respect to positive pregnancy outcomes following IVF/ICSI. These findings suggest that catheter selection may be guided by procedural considerations and operator preference rather than expected differences in pregnancy rates. Large scale randomized controlled trials and studies are required to validate these findings.

References

Awonuga A, Nabi A, Govindbhai J, Birch H, Stewart B. Contamination of embryo transfer catheter and treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:198-201.

Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Amin YM. Dummy embryo transfer using methylene blue dye. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(7):1257-9.

Sundstrom P, Wramsby H, Persson P, Liedholm P. Filled bladder simplifies human embryo transfer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91(5):506-7.

Lewin A, Schenker JG, Avrech O, Shapira S, Safran A, Friedler S. The role of uterine straightening by passive bladder distension before embryo transfer in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(1):32-4.

Urman B, Aksoy S, Alatas C, Mercan R, Nuhoglu A, Isiklar A, Balaban B. Comparing two embryo transfer catheters. Use of a trial transfer to determine the catheter applied. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(2):135-8.

Sharif K, Afnan M, Lenton W. Mock embryo transfer with a full bladder immediately before the real transfer for in-vitro fertilization treatment: the Birmingham experience of 113 cases. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(7):1715-8.

Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(4):678-81.

Prapas N, Prapas Y, Panagiotidis Y, Prapas S, Vanderzwalmen P, Makedos G. Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(8):1791-5.

Strickler RC, Christianson C, Crane JP, Curato A, Knight AB, Yang V. Ultrasound guidance for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(1):54-61.

Sallam HN, Sadek SS. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):1042-6.

Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):1037-41.

Burke LM, Davenport AT, Russell GB, Deaton JL. Predictors of success after embryo transfer: experience from a single provider. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1001-4.

Choe JK, Nazari A, Check JH, Summers-Chase D, Swenson K. Marked improvement in clinical pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization embryo transfer seen when transfer technique and catheter were changed. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2001;28(4):223-4.

Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go KJ, Gutmann JN, Corson SL. Ultrasound guided soft embryo catheters will improve pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2002;15(1):107-12.

De Placido G, Wilding M, Stina I, Mollo A, Alviggi E, Tolino A, et al. The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19(1):14 -8.

Sallam HN, Agameya AF, Rahman AF, Ezzeldin F, Sallam AN. Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer-experience from a single provider. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(4):135-42.

Abou-Setta AM, Al-Inany HG, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Aboulghar MA. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3114-21.

Ruhlmann C, Gnocchi DC, Cattaneo AR, Molina LG, Rivadeneira LR, Tessari L, Martínez AG. Embryo Transfer Catheters: Softer is Easier. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19:204-9.

van Weering HG, Schats R, McDonnell J, Vink JM, Vermeiden JP, Hompes PG. The impact of the embryo transfer catheter on the pregnancy rate in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(3):666-70.