Oocyte count at retrieval as predictor of pregnancy rate in different age groups in the Indian population

Authors

  • Aneesha M. Grover Nova Fertility and IVF, Vasant Vihar, Delhi, India
  • Vandana Bhatia Nova Fertility and IVF, Vasant Vihar, Delhi, India
  • Sonia Malik Nova Fertility and IVF, Vasant Vihar, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263440

Keywords:

Oocyte number, Clinical pregnancy rate, Age, IVF success rate

Abstract

Background: An important consideration while planning in vitro fertilization (IVF) is whether an age-specific oocyte number can predict treatment success. Identifying such thresholds may aid counselling regarding embryo pooling and the need for donor oocytes.

Methods: This retrospective, multicentric, cross-sectional study was conducted at Nova Fertility and IVF Clinics across India. Women aged 21-50 years undergoing IVF between August 2019 and July 2024 who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. A total of 1994 patients were enrolled: 149 aged 21-25 years, 580 aged 26-30 years, 813 aged 31-35 years, 381 aged 36-40 years, and 71 aged >40 years. Clinical pregnancy rates were evaluated across age groups and varying mature oocyte (MII) yields using appropriate statistical methods.

Results: Total oocyte retrieved declined with advancing age, whereas the median number of mature oocytes remained relatively stable. The minimum MII oocyte number associated with successful outcomes decreased with increasing age: 9.5 at 21-25 years age, 7.5 at 31-35 years, and 4.5 at 36-40 years, increasing to 5.5 in women >40 years. There was a non -linear relation between age, oocyte yield and clinical pregnancy outcomes, with most favourable outcomes in women aged 26-35 years and low success rates at the extremes of reproductive age (<25 years and >36 years).

Conclusions: Although the mature oocyte number associated with successful IVF outcomes varies with age, oocyte number alone does not determine success. Thus, individualized counselling remains essential.

References

Shingshetty L, Cameron NJ, Mclernon DJ, Bhattacharya S. Predictors of success after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(5):742-51.

Kan A, Leung P, Luo K, Fay L, Tan C. Do Asian women do as well as their Caucasian counterparts in IVF treatment: Cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41:946-51.

Patel AP, Patel JA, Cruz M, Gupte-Shah A, Garcia Velasco JA, Banker MR. Ethnicity is an independent predictor of IVF-ICSI outcome: a study of 5,549 cycles in Spain and India. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(10):819-22.

Wang P, Zhao C, Xu W. The association between the number of oocytes retrieved and cumulative live birth rate in different female age strata. Sci Rep. 2023;13:14516.

Tur-Kaspa T, Lambe-Steinmiller J, Trowbridge D, Levrant S, Zoneraich N, Zhang JX. Oocyte maturity rate is an age-independent predictor of blastocyst development and euploidy rates: a multicenter retrospective study. J IVF-Worldwide. 2024;2(4):10-17.

Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1768-74.

Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, et al. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ~15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:661-70.e1.

Bahadur G, Homburg R, Jayaprakasan K, Raperport CJ, Huirne JAF, Acharya S, et al. Correlation of IVF outcomes and number of oocytes retrieved: a UK retrospective longitudinal observational study of 172 341 non-donor cycles. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1):e064711.

Fanton M, Cho JH, Baker VL, Loewke K. A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(5):762-9.

Sunkara SK. Number of oocytes and IVF outcomes: Real-world evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;89:102341.

Wu LH, Humm KC, Dodge LE, Sakkas D, Hacker MR, Penzias AS. IVF outcomes are paradoxically poorer under age 25. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):S264.

Lebovitz O, Haas J, Mor N, Zilberberg E, Aizer A, Kirshenbaum M, et al. Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):395.

Eftekhar M, Mirhashemi E, Tabibnejad N. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in different subgroups of poor ovarian responders fulfilling the POSEIDON criteria. Middle East Fertil Society J. 2018;23:1.

Morin SJ, Patounakis G, Juneau CR, Neal SA, Scott RT, Seli E. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(8):1489-98.

Rodríguez-Varela C, Mascarós JM, Labarta E, Silla N, Bosch E. Minimum number of mature oocytes needed to obtain at least one euploid blastocyst according to female age in in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 2024;122(4):658-66.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Grover, A. M., Bhatia, V., & Malik, S. (2026). Oocyte count at retrieval as predictor of pregnancy rate in different age groups in the Indian population. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(10), 4018–4025. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263440

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles