Myometrial disease extent on standardized morphological uterus sonographic assessment transvaginal ultrasound is associated with severe dysmenorrhea in women with adenomyosis: a prospective observational study

Authors

  • Essa M. Arafa Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternity and Children Hospital, Hail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263411

Keywords:

Adenomyosis, Dysmenorrhea, Transvaginal ultrasound, MUSA, Pelvic pain, Disease extent

Abstract

Background: Aim was to evaluate associations between standardized morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) transvaginal ultrasound features and dysmenorrhea severity in women with adenomyosis.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 42 consecutive premenopausal women with secondary dysmenorrhea and sonographically diagnosed adenomyosis between March 2025 and March 2026. Standardized transvaginal ultrasound was performed using a GE Voluson E8 system with an 8-MHz transvaginal transducer. MUSA features, disease type, and myometrial disease extent were recorded. Dysmenorrhea was assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. Group comparisons and diagnostic performance measures were evaluated.

Results: Participants had mild (n=16), moderate (n=10), or severe (n=16) dysmenorrhea. Heavy menstrual bleeding, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, several direct MUSA features, and the presence of at least two direct MUSA features increased across symptom groups. Myometrial involvement >50% occurred in 56.3% of women with severe dysmenorrhea versus 6.3% with mild symptoms. For severe dysmenorrhea, disease extent >50% had 56.3% sensitivity, 88.5% specificity, 75.0% positive predictive value, 76.7% negative predictive value, and 76.2% accuracy.

Conclusions: Greater myometrial disease extent was strongly associated with dysmenorrhea severity in this cohort. Standardized reporting of disease extent may add clinically useful information to MUSA-based ultrasound assessment, but larger patient-level studies are required to determine independent predictive value.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alcázar JL, Vara J, Usandizaga C, Ajossa S, Pascual MA, Guerriero S. Transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing adenomyosis: a systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;161(2):397-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14609

Biasioli A, Degano M, Restaino S, Bagolin M, Moro F, Ciccarone F, et al. Innovative ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and correlation with symptoms: a retrospective re-evaluation. Biomedicines. 2024;12(2):463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020463

Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bordonne C, Maitrot-Mantelet L, et al. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(2):349-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa307

Bourdon M, Santulli P, Marcellin L, Maignien C, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Bordonne C, et al. Adenomyosis: an update regarding its diagnosis and clinical features. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(10):102228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102228

Bulun SE, Yildiz S, Adli M, Wei JJ. Adenomyosis pathogenesis: insights from next-generation sequencing. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(6):1086-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab017

Bulun SE, Yildiz S, Adli M, Chakravarti D, Parker JB, Milad M, et al. Endometriosis and adenomyosis: shared pathophysiology. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(5):746-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.03.006

Schrager S, Yogendran L, Marquez CM, Sadowski EA. Adenomyosis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2022;105(1):33-38.

Sharara FI, Kheil MH, Feki A, Rahman S, Klebanoff JS, Ayoubi JM, Moawad GN. Current and prospective treatment of adenomyosis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153410

Tellum T, Munro MG. Classifications of adenomyosis and correlation of phenotypes in imaging and histopathology to clinical outcomes: a review. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2022;11(1):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-021-00320-5

Trommelen LM, De Leeuw RA, Van den Bosch T, Huirne JAF. Grading sonographic severity of adenomyosis: a pilot study assessing feasibility and interobserver reliability. J Ultrasound Med. 2024;44(3):495-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16612

Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, et al. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(5):576-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19096

Yavuz O, Akdöner A, Özgözen ME, Ertan B, Kurt S, Ulukuş EC, Güney M. Prediction of adenomyosis according to revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment features. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1387515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1387515

Tu F, Hellman K. Primary dysmenorrhea: diagnosis and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(4):752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004341

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Arafa, E. M. (2026). Myometrial disease extent on standardized morphological uterus sonographic assessment transvaginal ultrasound is associated with severe dysmenorrhea in women with adenomyosis: a prospective observational study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(10), 3818–3822. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263411

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles